CVE-2013-0002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Windows Forms (aka WinForms) component in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application that leverages improper counting of objects during a memory copy operation, aka "WinForms Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow in Windows Forms (WinForms) component of Microsoft .NET Framework allows remote code execution through improper object counting during memory copy operations. Exploitable via crafted XBAP (XAML Browser Applications) or malicious .NET applications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 1.1= 2.0= 4.0= 3.5= 3.5.1= 4.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed .NET Framework versionCheck the Windows Registry for the .NET Framework version by running: 'reg query "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\Full" /v Version' for .NET 4.x or 'reg query "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.5" /v Version' for .NET 3.5. PowerShell can also be used: Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\Full' -Name VersionAffected if The installed version matches 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.0, or 4.5 (or any version falling within these release families without the security patch applied)
-
Verify if WinForms is in useCheck if any .NET WinForms applications are installed or running on the system. Look for executables compiled against .NET in Program Files, or check running processes for applications using System.Windows.Forms. Inspect the Global Assembly Cache (GAC) at C:\Windows\assembly for Microsoft.Windows.Forms entries.Affected if WinForms components (System.Windows.Forms.dll) are present and loaded by .NET applications on the system
-
Confirm XBAP support is enabled in Internet ExplorerCheck the Internet Explorer security settings for XAML Browser Applications. In IE, go to Internet Options > Security > Custom Level > Enable XAML Browser Applications. Alternatively, check the registry key: 'reg query "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\2" /v 2500' for zone settings, or examine IE add-on management for 'Windows Presentation Foundation' add-ons.Affected if XBAP support is enabled in Internet Explorer, allowing .NET code to run in the browser context
-
Check for .NET application execution policyReview whether .NET applications can be executed on the system by checking file associations for .exe and .config files, and verify the presence of the .NET runtime. Run 'dir C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework' to list installed runtime versions.Affected if .NET Framework runtime is installed and .NET applications can be launched on the system
The environment is affected if a vulnerable .NET Framework version (1.0 through 4.5) is installed AND WinForms is in use OR XBAP support is enabled, allowing the buffer overflow to be triggered through malicious XBAP content or a crafted .NET application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patches for all affected .NET Framework versions (1.0 SP3 through 4.5). Consider disabling XBAP in Internet Explorer as a defense-in-depth measure.
Migrate to .NET Framework 4.8 or transition to .NET 6/7/8 (LTS)
- This vulnerability affects .NET Framework versions that are all end-of-life and no longer supported by Microsoft.
- For .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, and 4.0: Microsoft no longer provides security updates as these versions reached end of support.
- There is no patch available for these end-of-life versions.
- Mitigation options: 1) Migrate applications to a supported .NET Framework version (4.8 or later) or .NET Core/.NET 5+; 2) Disable .NET Framework applications in browser settings; 3) Block XBAP and untrusted .NET applications at the network perimeter; 4) Apply network segmentation to isolate systems running these old .NET versions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data