CVE-2013-0003
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in a System.DirectoryServices.Protocols (S.DS.P) namespace method in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application that leverages a missing array-size check during a memory copy operation, aka "S.DS.P Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow in System.DirectoryServices.Protocols (S.DS.P) namespace in Microsoft .NET Framework versions 2.0 SP2 through 4.5. The vulnerability stems from a missing array-size check during a memory copy operation, allowing remote code execution when exploited via crafted XBAP or .NET applications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 4.0= 3.5= 3.5.1= 4.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed .NET Framework versionCheck the Windows Registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v{version}\Install and SPLevel, or use the 'dotnet --version' command if .NET Core/5+ is present (though this CVE affects .NET Framework only)Affected if Version is 2.0 SP2 or higher through 4.5 (versions 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.0, or 4.5)
-
Determine if System.DirectoryServices.Protocols is in useSearch application source code for 'using System.DirectoryServices.Protocols;' or 'S.DS.P' namespace imports, and check compiled assemblies using ildasm or a .NET decompiler for references to System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.dllAffected if The application or its dependencies reference and use the System.DirectoryServices.Protocols namespace
-
Check if XBAP (XAML Browser Applications) are enabledIn Internet Explorer, go to Internet Options > Security > Custom Level and check the 'Enable XAML browser applications' setting; also check HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_SECURITY_CSP for Group Policy overridesAffected if XBAP is enabled in Internet Explorer or allowed via policy, as this is one attack vector for the vulnerability
-
Identify if untrusted .NET applications can executeReview .NET security policy settings (if .NET 3.5 or earlier): run 'caspol -list' to see code groups, and check if applications from the Internet or Intranet zones have full trust; for .NET 4.x, examine <runtime> security settings in machine.configAffected if Untrusted or partially trusted .NET code can run with full permissions, allowing exploitation via crafted applications
The environment is affected if .NET Framework versions 2.0 SP2 through 4.5 are installed AND applications using System.DirectoryServices.Protocols run, or XBAP/untrusted .NET applications are permitted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates for .NET Framework once released. Consider disabling XAML browser applications (XBAP) in Internet Explorer and restricting untrusted .NET applications until the patch is deployed.
- Open Windows Update or Microsoft Update on the affected system
- Search for security updates for Microsoft .NET Framework
- Install the applicable security update (MS13-004 or subsequent superseded updates) that addresses CVE-2013-0003
- Restart the system if prompted
- Verify the update was installed by checking the installed updates list
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0003 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data