CVE-2013-0384
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Server component in Oracle MySQL 5.1.66 and earlier, and 5.5.28 and earlier, allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Information Schema.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server's Information Schema component allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service. The specific vulnerability mechanism is unspecified in the available description, but targets the virtual database that stores metadata about other databases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.0, <= 5.1.66>= 5.5.0, <= 5.5.28= 10.04= 11.10= 12.04= 12.10= 7.0= 6.3= 6.0= 6.0>= 5.1.0, < 5.1.67>= 5.2.0, < 5.2.14>= 5.3.0, < 5.3.12>= 5.5.0, < 5.5.29= 10.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if MySQL or MariaDB is installedRun 'mysql --version' or 'mysqld --version' from the command line to display the installed database server versionAffected if No MySQL or MariaDB server is found, then the system is not affected by this CVE
-
Verify the exact installed versionConnect to MySQL and run 'SELECT VERSION();' or check the package manager output (dpkg -l mysql-server or rpm -qa | grep mysql)Affected if The version falls within the affected ranges: MySQL 5.1.0-5.1.66, 5.5.0-5.5.28; MariaDB 5.1.0-5.1.66, 5.2.0-5.2.13, 5.3.0-5.3.11, 5.5.0-5.5.28, or 10.0.0
-
Confirm Information Schema is accessibleConnect to MySQL and run 'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES;' - this verifies the Information Schema virtual database is operationalAffected if The query returns a count successfully, indicating the vulnerable component is active (this is the default state in MySQL)
-
Check for remote authentication enabledReview MySQL configuration files (my.cnf or my.ini) for 'bind-address' settings and verify user accounts with host permissions allowing remote connections (SELECT user,host FROM mysql.user WHERE host NOT IN ('localhost','127.0.0.1'));Affected if Remote authentication is enabled and user accounts permit remote connections - the CVE can be exploited by remote authenticated attackers
A system is affected if it runs any MySQL or MariaDB version within the specified vulnerable ranges AND has the Information Schema accessible (default state) AND allows remote authenticated access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.1.675.2.145.3.12
Update MySQL to version 5.1.67 or later for the 5.1 branch, or 5.5.29 or later for the 5.5 branch to obtain the vendor patch.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0384 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data