Maximo Asset ManagementApplication · Ibm

CVE-2013-0451

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 6.2 through 6.2.8 and 7.1 through 7.1.1.12 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management versions 6.2 through 6.2.8 and 7.1 through 7.1.1.12 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. The CVSS 6.5 indicates network-exploitable, medium-complexity attack requiring authentication.

MitigationApply IBM patches for this vulnerability, or upgrade to a supported version. Implement parameterized queries and input validation on all database interactions as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Maximo Asset ManagementApplication
Affected:= 6.2= 6.2.1= 6.2.2= 6.2.3= 6.2.4= 6.2.5= 6.2.6= 6.2.6.1= 6.2.7= 6.2.8= 7.1= 7.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Maximo Asset Management installation
    Check for the Maximo application server (typically WebSphere or Oracle WebLogic) and look for the Maximo ear files in the deployment directory. On Windows, check Program Files\IBM\Maximo or the application server's deployment folder. On Linux/Unix, check /opt/IBM/Maximo or the application server's deployments directory.
    Affected if IBM Maximo Asset Management software is found on the system
  2. Identify installed Maximo version
    Locate the maximo.properties or maximo.xml file in the application deployment directory. Alternatively, log into Maximo and go to About > System Information in the toolbar, or check the version.txt file in the Maximo installation directory.
    Affected if Version matches 6.2.x (6.2 through 6.2.8) or 7.1.x through 7.1.1.12
  3. Verify the application is network-accessible
    Check if the Maximo web interface (typically on port 9080, 9443, or 80/443) is listening and accessible from the network. Review the application server configuration for exposed endpoints.
    Affected if Maximo web interface is accessible over the network without proper network segmentation or authentication barriers
  4. Confirm user authentication mechanisms
    Review the WebSphere or WebLogic console configuration for Maximo. Check if LDAP or Maximo's internal authentication is configured. Verify whether guest or anonymous access is enabled in the Maximo system properties.
    Affected if The application allows remote authenticated users or has misconfigured authentication that could be exploited
  5. Check for database interaction modules
    Inspect Maximo's MBO (Maximo Business Object) configuration and any custom integrations that execute database queries. Review the maximo.properties file for JDBC datasource configurations.
    Affected if Database-facing modules are in use without parameterized query enforcement

The environment is affected if IBM Maximo Asset Management versions 6.2 through 6.2.8 or 7.1 through 7.1.1.12 are installed and the web interface is network-accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM patches for this vulnerability, or upgrade to a supported version. Implement parameterized queries and input validation on all database interactions as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Maximo Asset Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,360
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0451 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0451 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data