CVE-2013-0609
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0613.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat versions 9.x before 9.5.3, 10.x before 10.1.5, and 11.x before 11.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. This is distinct from the related CVE-2013-0613.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 9.1= 9.1.1= 9.1.2= 9.1.3= 9.2= 9.3= 9.3.1= 9.3.2= 9.3.3= 9.3.4= 9.4= 9.0= 9.1= 9.1.1= 9.1.2= 9.1.3= 9.2= 9.3= 9.3.1= 9.3.2= 9.3.3= 9.3.4= 9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Reader versionOpen Adobe Reader, then go to Help > About Adobe Reader to display the version numberAffected if Version starts with 9.x and is earlier than 9.5.3, or starts with 10.x and is earlier than 10.1.5, or starts with 11.x and is earlier than 11.0.1
-
Check Adobe Acrobat versionOpen Adobe Acrobat, then go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat to display the version numberAffected if Version starts with 9.x and is earlier than 9.5.3, or starts with 10.x and is earlier than 10.1.5, or starts with 11.x and is earlier than 11.0.1
-
Check installed version via Windows Programs and FeaturesOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features (or Settings > Apps on Windows 10/11), locate Adobe Acrobat Reader or Adobe Acrobat in the list and note the version columnAffected if The listed version falls within the affected ranges: 9.0 through 9.4, or any 10.x version before 10.1.5, or any 11.x version before 11.0.1
-
Check executable file version directlyLocate the Adobe executable (e.g., AcroRd32.exe for Reader or AcroRd32.exe for Acrobat, typically in C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Reader X\Reader\ or similar path), right-click the file, select Properties, and check the Details tab for Product VersionAffected if The file version shows a version matching the affected ranges: 9.0.x through 9.4.x, 10.x before 10.1.5, or 11.x before 11.0.1
If Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat is installed with any version from 9.0 through 9.4, any 10.x before 10.1.5, or any 11.x before 11.0.1, the environment is affected by this integer overflow vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Adobe Reader and Acrobat to version 9.5.3, 10.1.5, 11.0.1 or later to patch the integer overflow vulnerability.
Adobe Acrobat/Reader 9.5.3+, 10.1.5+, or 11.0.1+ (choose the major version branch relevant to your environment)
- Identify the currently installed Adobe Acrobat or Adobe Reader version from the Help > About menu
- For Adobe Acrobat 9.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Acrobat 9.5.3 or later
- For Adobe Acrobat 10.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Acrobat 10.1.5 or later
- For Adobe Acrobat 11.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Acrobat 11.0.1 or later
- For Adobe Reader 9.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Reader 9.5.3 or later
- For Adobe Reader 10.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Reader 10.1.5 or later
- For Adobe Reader 11.x users: Upgrade to Adobe Reader 11.0.1 or later
- Verify the version after installation from Help > About to confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0609 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0609 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data