FfmpegApplication

CVE-2013-0852

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-12-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The parse_picture_segment function in libavcodec/pgssubdec.c in FFmpeg before 1.1 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via crafted RLE data, which triggers an out-of-bounds array access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Out-of-bounds array access vulnerability in FFmpeg's PGS subtitle decoder (parse_picture_segment function in libavcodec/pgssubdec.c) before version 1.1, triggered by specially crafted RLE-encoded data in media files, allowing potential remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade to FFmpeg 1.1 or later, or apply the vendor patch for this specific vulnerability. Recompile and redeploy any applications statically linking the vulnerable FFmpeg library.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FfmpegApplication
Affected:<= 1.0= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FFmpeg version
    Run 'ffmpeg -version' and note the version number in the output
    Affected if The version is 1.0 or lower, or falls within the 0.3.x through 0.4.x series listed in the affected versions
  2. Verify PGS subtitle decoder presence
    Run 'ffmpeg -decoders 2>/dev/null | grep -i pgs' or 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i pgs' to list decoders containing 'pgs'
    Affected if A PGS subtitle decoder (pgssubdec) is listed as available
  3. Confirm media processing capability
    Check if FFmpeg can decode PGS subtitles by running 'ffmpeg -i <testfile> -f null -' where <testfile> is a media file containing PGS subtitles, or inspect a known PGS file with 'ffprobe -show_streams <file>'
    Affected if FFmpeg successfully processes or detects PGS subtitle streams in a media file
  4. Check static library linkage if applicable
    If FFmpeg is statically linked in a custom application, identify the library binary and run 'strings <library> | grep pgssubdec' or check the compiled object files
    Affected if The pgssubdec code is compiled into a statically linked binary that your application uses

You are affected if you run any FFmpeg version listed as vulnerable AND the PGS subtitle decoder is enabled and capable of processing media files with PGS subtitles.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to FFmpeg 1.1 or later, or apply the vendor patch for this specific vulnerability. Recompile and redeploy any applications statically linking the vulnerable FFmpeg library.

Recommended fix High confidence

FFmpeg 1.1 or later (the vulnerability was fixed in version 1.1)

  1. 1. Check current FFmpeg version by running 'ffmpeg -version' or checking the installed package
  2. 2. Download FFmpeg 1.1 or later from the official source (www.ffmpeg.org) or use your system's package manager
  3. 3. If using a package manager, update to a version >= 1.1 (e.g., 'apt-get update && apt-get install ffmpeg' or 'yum update ffmpeg')
  4. 4. If building from source, download the 1.1 or newer release from git.videolan.org or FFmpeg archives
  5. 5. Replace the old ffmpeg binary and libavcodec library with the new version
  6. 6. Verify the new version is installed by running 'ffmpeg -version'
Caveat Major version upgrades in FFmpeg may introduce API/ABI changes; test any applications that depend on FFmpeg libraries after upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ffmpeg Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0852 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0852 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data