FfmpegApplication

CVE-2013-0854

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-12-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The mjpeg_decode_scan_progressive_ac function in libavcodec/mjpegdec.c in FFmpeg before 1.1 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via crafted MJPEG data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in FFmpeg's libavcodec mjpeg_decode_scan_progressive_ac function when decoding crafted progressive MJPEG data. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to potentially achieve code execution via specially crafted MJPEG files or streams.

MitigationUpgrade FFmpeg to version 1.1 or later to obtain the patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation on MJPEG data before decoding and/or deploy the affected system behind a sandbox to limit blast radius.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FfmpegApplication
Affected:<= 1.0= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed FFmpeg version
    Run 'ffmpeg -version' or 'ffmpeg -version 2>&1' to display version information
    Affected if The version displayed is 0.3.x, 0.4.x through 0.4.6, or 1.0.x or earlier (versions <=1.0 are affected)
  2. Verify libavcodec library version
    Run 'ffmpeg -version 2>&1 | grep libavcodec' or check the shared library file with 'ldd $(which ffmpeg) | grep libavcodec' and examine the library file
    Affected if The libavcodec library version matches the affected FFmpeg versions (0.3.x through 0.4.6, or <=1.0)
  3. Identify MJPEG processing components
    Search for binaries or applications that link against libavcodec for MJPEG handling: 'ldconfig -p | grep libavcodec' and review any custom MJPEG decoders using this library
    Affected if libavcodec is present and actively used for decoding media files
  4. Inspect MJPEG decoding usage
    Review application logs, file processing patterns, or system services that handle MJPEG/progressive JPEG files. Check for ffmpeg commands or API calls processing .mjpeg, .jpg files with progressive format
    Affected if Progressive MJPEG files are being decoded by the affected FFmpeg library

A system is affected if it runs any FFmpeg version 0.3.x through 0.4.6 or version 1.0 and earlier that decodes progressive MJPEG data using libavcodec.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FFmpeg to version 1.1 or later to obtain the patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation on MJPEG data before decoding and/or deploy the affected system behind a sandbox to limit blast radius.

Recommended fix High confidence

FFmpeg 1.1 or later (preferably latest stable release)

  1. 1. Check current FFmpeg version using: ffmpeg -version
  2. 2. Upgrade FFmpeg to version 1.1 or later. For Linux systems using package managers: apt-get update && apt-get install ffmpeg (Debian/Ubuntu) or yum install ffmpeg (RHEL/CentOS)
  3. 3. Alternatively, compile from source: obtain FFmpeg 1.1 or later from ffmpeg.org or git.videolan.org
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: ffmpeg -version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ffmpeg Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0854 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0854 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data