iOSOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2013-1241

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-05-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The ISM module in Cisco IOS on ISR G2 routers does not properly handle authentication-header packets, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (module reload) via a series of malformed packets, aka Bug ID CSCub92025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ISM (IP Security) module in Cisco IOS on ISR G2 routers fails to properly handle malformed authentication-header (AH) packets. When a remote authenticated attacker sends specially crafted AH packets, the module reloads, causing denial of service. The attack requires valid authentication credentials.

MitigationApply the Cisco IOS fix for Bug ID CSCub92025. Upgrade to a Cisco IOS version that includes the remediation. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to authenticated remote attackers and monitor for unusual ISM module reloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
iOSOperating system
Affected:all versions
1921 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
1941 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
1941w Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
2901 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
2911 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
2921 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
2951 Integrated Services RouterHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the router model
    Run 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the hardware model
    Affected if The device is a Cisco 1921, 1941, 1941w, 2901, 2911, 2921, or 2951 Integrated Services Router (ISR G2)
  2. Check the Cisco IOS version
    Run 'show version' to display the installed IOS version
    Affected if The device is an affected ISR G2 model running any IOS version (all versions are vulnerable)
  3. Verify if ISM/IPSec is configured
    Run 'show crypto ipsec sa' or 'show crypto isakmp sa' to check for active IPSec security associations
    Affected if ISM/IPSec is actively configured and running on the device (the vulnerability requires ISM to be enabled for the attack to apply)
  4. Check for ISM module reloads
    Run 'show logging' or 'show tech-support' and look for ISM reload messages or crashinfo
    Affected if Recent unexpected ISM module reloads are present in logs without an obvious cause

A user is affected if they are running Cisco IOS on an ISR G2 router (1921/1941/2901/2911/2921/2951) with ISM/IPSec enabled, as all versions of IOS on these platforms are vulnerable to malformed AH packet-induced reloads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco IOS fix for Bug ID CSCub92025. Upgrade to a Cisco IOS version that includes the remediation. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to authenticated remote attackers and monitor for unusual ISM module reloads.

Fix this in iOS Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1241 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data