CVE-2013-1675
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla Firefox before 21.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.6, Thunderbird before 17.0.6, and Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.6 do not properly initialize data structures for the nsDOMSVGZoomEvent::mPreviousScale and nsDOMSVGZoomEvent::mNewScale functions, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted web site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMozilla Firefox and Thunderbird fail to initialize the mPreviousScale and mNewScale data structures in the nsDOMSVGZoomEvent functions before use. This causes uninitialized stack/heap memory contents to be accessible when a crafted webpage triggers SVG zoom events, allowing remote attackers to read sensitive process memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.0>= 17.0, < 17.0.6= 12.04= 12.10= 13.04= 7.0= 2.1= 5.0= 6.0= 5.9= 6.4= 5.0_s390x= 6.0_s390x= 5.9_s390x= 6.4_s390xCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Firefox versionIn Firefox, go to Help > About Firefox, or type 'about:support' in the address bar, or run 'firefox --version' from command lineAffected if Version is < 21.0 OR (>= 17.0 AND < 17.0.6)
-
Confirm SVG support is enabledIn Firefox, type 'about:config' and search for 'svg', ensure 'svg.enabled' is not set to false (default is true)Affected if SVG support is disabled - user is not affected; if enabled - proceed to next check
-
Check browser usage on shared systemsFor multi-user systems, check browser history or cache directories in user profiles for any recently visited pages containing SVG contentAffected if Users have browsed untrusted websites - potential exposure vector exists
A user is affected if they are running Firefox version < 21.0 or between 17.0 and 17.0.6, with SVG support enabled, and have visited or could visit a crafted webpage triggering the SVG zoom event handler.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.0.621.0
Upgrade Firefox to version 21.0 or later (or ESR 17.0.6+), and Thunderbird to version 17.0.6 or later. Alternatively, disable SVG support in the browser if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
Firefox 21.0 or later; Firefox ESR 17.0.6 or later; Thunderbird 17.0.6 or later
- Check the currently installed Firefox version by navigating to 'Help' > 'About Firefox'
- For Ubuntu/Debian systems, run: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade firefox
- For Enterprise Linux systems, run: sudo yum update firefox
- For Red Hat systems, run: sudo rhn_patch --update firefox
- Alternatively, download the latest Firefox from the official Mozilla website (https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/)
- Restart Firefox after the upgrade completes
- Verify the installed version is 21.0 or later (or ESR 17.0.6 or later)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1675 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1675 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data