CVE-2013-1777
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Community Edition 3.0.0.3 and other products, does not properly implement the RMI classloader, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using the JMX connector to send a crafted serialized object.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1 (and IBM WAS Community Edition 3.0.0.3) improperly implements the RMI classloader, allowing remote attackers to send crafted serialized objects through the JMX connector and achieve arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0= 3.0.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Geronimo or IBM WAS CE installationLook for the server installation directory - Geronimo is typically in 'geronimo' folder, IBM WAS CE in 'wasce' or 'WebSphereCE' folder. Check for 'bin/startup.sh', 'bin/geronimo.sh', or similar startup scripts.Affected if Either Apache Geronimo or IBM WAS Community Edition is installed on the system
-
Determine the installed versionCheck version metadata: for Geronimo look in 'bin/geronimo-versioning.xml' or the manifest of startup scripts; for WAS CE check 'systeminfo' via the admin console or version files in the installation root.Affected if The version is exactly 3.0 for Apache Geronimo, or exactly 3.0.0.3 for IBM WAS Community Edition
-
Verify JMX Remoting is enabledExamine the JMX connector configuration in 'var/config/username-password.properties' or 'etc/org.apache.geronimo.management.JMXSecurity.properties'. Also check 'deploy/plan/jmx-connector-plan.xml' if present. Look for RMI connector or JMX remoting configuration entries.Affected if JMX Remoting (RMI connector) is explicitly configured and enabled in the deployment plan or configuration files
-
Confirm JMX ports are network-accessibleCheck network listening ports - JMX typically uses ports 9999 (Geronimo default) or 1099 (RMI registry). Review 'var/config/org.apache.geronimo.server.shell' or server startup logs for configured JMX ports. Use 'netstat -an' or 'ss -tlnp' to verify which ports are bound.Affected if JMX/RMI ports are bound to 0.0.0.0 or otherwise accessible from non-localhost interfaces
You are affected if you have Apache Geronimo 3.0 or IBM WAS Community Edition 3.0.0.3 installed with JMX Remoting enabled and accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Geronimo 3.0.1 or later, or apply vendor patches; if upgrading is not feasible, disable JMX remoting or restrict network access to JMX ports.
Apache Geronimo 3.0.1 or later
- Upgrade Apache Geronimo from version 3.0 to version 3.0.1 or later, as the vulnerability affects versions before 3.0.1
- For IBM WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 3.0.0.3, apply the IBM fix referenced in support document swg21643282
- If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable the JMX Remoting connector functionality or restrict network access to JMX ports
- Ensure JMX authentication is enabled and strong credentials are configured if JMX must remain enabled
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1777 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1777 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data