CVE-2013-1927
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe IcedTea-Web plugin before 1.2.3 and 1.3.x before 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file that validates as both a GIF and a Java JAR file, aka "GIFAR."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe IcedTea-Web Java browser plugin fails to properly validate file types, allowing a malicious file to be interpreted as both a valid GIF image and a Java JAR archive (GIFAR attack). When the plugin processes this crafted file, it executes the embedded Java code with full applet privileges, enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.2= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.1= 1.1.1= 1.1.2= 1.1.3= 10.04= 11.10= 12.04= 12.10= 12.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if IcedTea-Web plugin is installedLook for the icedtea-web package or plugin files. On Linux systems, check /usr/lib/jvm/ or /usr/share/icedtea-web/ directories. For browsers, check for icedteaplugin in ~/.mozilla/plugins/ or /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/Affected if IcedTea-Web plugin files exist on the system
-
Determine the installed IcedTea-Web versionRun 'rpm -q icedtea-web' on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora, 'dpkg -l icedtea-6-plugin' or 'dpkg -l icedtea-7-plugin' on Debian/Ubuntu, or 'rpm -qa | grep icedtea' on SUSE. Alternatively, check /usr/share/icedtea-web/version.propertiesAffected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 1.0 through 1.2.2, 1.1.1 through 1.1.3, or 1.0.1 through 1.0.6
-
Verify the Java browser plugin is enabledOpen a browser and navigate to about:plugins (Firefox) or chrome://plugins (Chrome). Check if IcedTea Web Plugin or similar Java plugin is listed as enabledAffected if The IcedTea Java browser plugin is loaded and active in any web browser
-
Confirm Java applets can executeCheck browser plugin settings or IcedTea configuration at ~/.icedtea/conf or /etc/icedtea-web/proxy.properties. Visit a page that loads a Java applet to test execution capabilityAffected if The plugin can load and execute Java applet code without explicit restrictions
If IcedTea-Web version 1.2.2 or earlier (including all 1.0.x, 1.1.x variants) is installed with the Java browser plugin enabled, the system is vulnerable to GIFAR attacks allowing arbitrary code execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade IcedTea-Web to version 1.2.3, 1.3.2, or later. Alternatively, disable the Java browser plugin entirely or restrict it to trusted sites only.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- icedtea.classpath.org
- icedtea.classpath.org
- icedtea.classpath.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- mail.openjdk.java.net
- osvdb.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- wiki.mageia.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1927 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data