JenkinsApplication · Cloudbees
CVE-2013-2034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Jenkins before 1.514, LTS before 1.509.1, and Enterprise 1.466.x before 1.466.14.1 and 1.480.x before 1.480.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) execute arbitrary code or (2) initiate deployment of binaries to a Maven repository via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple CSRF vulnerabilities in Jenkins before 1.514 and LTS before 1.509.1 allow remote attackers to hijack administrator authentication and execute arbitrary code or deploy binaries to Maven repositories by tricking authenticated admins into visiting malicious links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
JenkinsApplication
<= 1.513= 1.466= 1.480= 1.509CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Jenkins versionNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins, or access /api/json?tree=version endpoint, or check the jenkins.war file versionAffected if Version is 1.513 or earlier for main line releases, or 1.509 or earlier for LTS releases, or specifically versions 1.466, 1.480, or 1.509
-
Determine if Jenkins LTS or main lineCheck the version string - LTS versions have format like 1.509.x, main line versions like 1.514Affected if Running LTS version 1.509 or earlier, or main line version 1.513 or earlier
-
Verify admin web interface is accessibleAccess the Jenkins web console (port 8080 typically) and confirm login page is reachableAffected if Web interface is exposed to network where attackers could trick admins into visiting malicious links while logged in
-
Check if CSRF protection is enabledNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security and inspect 'CSRF Protection' setting (crumb issuer)Affected if CSRF protection is disabled or not configured (default in affected versions)
User is affected if running Jenkins version 1.513 or earlier (main line) or 1.509/earlier (LTS), with the web interface accessible to potential attackers and CSRF protection not enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Jenkins to version 1.514 or later (LTS to 1.509.1 or later, or Enterprise versions to 1.466.14.1/1.480.4.1 or later) to address the CSRF vulnerabilities.
Fix this in Jenkins
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data