Storage Data ProtectorApplication · Hp

CVE-2013-2335

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-06-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Storage Data Protector 6.20, 6.21, 7.00, and 7.01 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1733.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HP Storage Data Protector versions 6.20, 6.21, 7.00, and 7.01 contain an unspecified vulnerability allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code (ZDI-CAN-1733). The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 10, indicating critical severity with complete compromise potential.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of HP Storage Data Protector if available; otherwise, apply network segmentation and restrict access to the Data Protector services to trusted networks only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Storage Data ProtectorApplication
Affected:= 6.20= 6.21= 7.00= 7.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm HP Storage Data Protector installation
    Search for the Data Protector binaries or services. On Windows, check for omniinet.exe or related processes in Task Manager or look in Program Files for HP directories. On Linux/Unix, check /opt/HP or /opt/omni for HP Data Protector installation directories.
    Affected if HP Storage Data Protector software is found on the system.
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the version file or executable. On Windows, right-click the installed executable (such as omniinet.exe in the installation directory) and view Properties > Details for the version. On Linux/Unix, run 'omniinstaller -version' or check the contents of a version file in the installation directory if one exists.
    Affected if The version is exactly 6.20, 6.21, 7.00, or 7.01.
  3. Check for running Data Protector services
    Identify the Data Protector services or processes that are active. On Windows, open Services console and look for HP Data Protector services. On Linux/Unix, run 'ps -ef | grep -i omni' to find running Data Protector processes.
    Affected if Any HP Data Protector service or process is running on the affected version.

If HP Storage Data Protector version 6.20, 6.21, 7.00, or 7.01 is installed and running, the environment is affected by this critical remote code execution vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of HP Storage Data Protector if available; otherwise, apply network segmentation and restrict access to the Data Protector services to trusted networks only.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Contact HP for latest fixed version (HP Security Bulletin typically names specific patch/release)

  1. Contact HP support directly at h20564.www2.hp.com to obtain the specific patch or upgraded version for this vulnerability (ZDI-CAN-1733)
  2. Request the latest available version of HP Storage Data Protector that includes the security fix for CVE-2013-2335
  3. Apply the patch or upgrade following HP's official installation documentation
  4. Verify the installation and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Caveat Review HP release notes for any compatibility considerations before upgrading production systems

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Storage Data Protector Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
40.0 hours of engineering $7,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2335 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data