CVE-2013-2340
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability on the HP ProCurve JC###A, JC###B, JD###A, JD###B, JE###A, JF###A, JF###B, JF###C, JG###A, 658250-B21, and 658247-B21; HP 3COM routers and switches; and HP H3C routers and switches allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an unspecified critical vulnerability (CVSS 10) affecting HP ProCurve switch modules (JC###A/B, JD###A/B, JE###A, JF###A/B/C, JG###A), HP 3COM routers/switches, and HP H3C routers/switches. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2900= 2900g= 2900g-28hpwr= 2900g-28pwr= 3012= 3013= 3016= 3018= 3036= 3040= 3041= 5009= 5012= 5231= 5232= 5640= 4200g= 4200g-ntg= 4200g_pwr= 4210= 4210-24g= 4210-48g= 4210_pwr= 4210_pwr_9p_taa= 4500= 4500_pwr= 4510g= 4510g_pwr= 5500g-ei= 5500g-ei-pwr= 5500g-ei-sfp= 5500-ei= s5500-28c-ei= s5500-28c-ei-dc= s5500-28c-pwr-ei= s5500-28c-pwr-si= s5500-28c-si= s5500-28f-ei= s5500-52c-ei= s5500-52c-pwr-ei= s5500-52c-pwr-si= s5500-52c-si= s5600-26c= s5600-26c-pwr= msr_50_3ge= msr_50_g2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck the physical device label or log into the CLI and run 'display device manuinfo' or 'show system-information' to confirm the exact model number (e.g., 2900, 4200g, s5500-28c-ei, msr_50_g2)Affected if The model matches any of the affected products listed: HP 3COM Baseline Plus Switch (2900 series), HP 3COM Router (3012-5640 series), HP 3COM Switch (4200g-5500g series), HP H3C Ethernet Switch (s5500/s5600 series), or HP H3C Processing Module (msr_50_g2)
-
Check firmware versionLog into the device CLI and run 'display version' or 'show version' to obtain the installed firmware/software versionAffected if The firmware version matches any of the specific versions listed in the affected products (e.g., 2900, 2900g, 4210-24g, s5500-28c-ei, msr_50_3ge, msr_50_g2)
-
Verify device is HP 3COM or H3C brandedCheck the boot prompt, login banner, or run 'display device manuinfo' to confirm the vendor branding is HP 3COM or HP H3CAffected if The device is branded as HP 3COM or HP H3C and the model number matches the affected list
-
Confirm management interface accessibilityCheck if remote management protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, Telnet, SSH) are enabled and accessible from network by reviewing 'display ip interface' or 'display service' outputAffected if Remote management interfaces are exposed to untrusted networks (this is required for the remote attack vector)
-
Review device configuration for unknown vectorsExamine running configuration with 'display current-configuration' for any unusual or unexpected service entries, ACL modifications, or debugging features enabledAffected if Non-standard services, debugging features, or modified ACLs are present that could indicate exploitation attempts
You are affected if your device is an HP 3COM or HP H3C switch, router, or processing module matching any of the model numbers listed, regardless of firmware version, as this is a critical unspecified vulnerability in those specific products.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates immediately upon availability. If no patch exists, consider network segmentation, disabling unnecessary services, and implementing strict access controls to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2340 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data