Business Process MonitorApplication · Ibm

CVE-2013-2366

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Business Process Monitor 9.13.1 patch 1 and 9.22 patch 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1802.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Remote code execution vulnerability in HP Business Process Monitor versions 9.13.1 patch 1 and 9.22 patch 1 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via unspecified attack vectors.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches from HP for Business Process Monitor; if patches are unavailable, implement network segmentation and disable external access to the affected service to reduce exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Business Process MonitorApplication
Affected:= 9.13.1= 9.22

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate HP Business Process Monitor installation
    Search for BPM installation directories or check system inventory/scm for HP Business Process Monitor software packages. Common locations may include /opt/hp/bpm or C:\Program Files\HP\Business Process Monitor
    Affected if HP Business Process Monitor is not found on the system - not applicable
  2. Identify installed version
    Use the product's built-in version information utility, check the software manifest, or examine the main executable/version file in the installation directory to determine if the version is 9.13.1 or 9.22
    Affected if Version is exactly 9.13.1 or 9.22 (or these versions with patch 1 applied)
  3. Confirm patch level
    Check if patches 9.13.1 patch 1 or 9.22 patch 1 have been applied by reviewing the installed patches, hotfixes, or update history within the BPM management console or system logs
    Affected if The specific patch 1 for either 9.13.1 or 9.22 is present - this indicates the vulnerable version is installed
  4. Assess network exposure
    Review firewall rules, network configuration, and access controls to determine if the BPM web interface or management ports are accessible from untrusted networks or without authentication
    Affected if The BPM service is exposed to unauthenticated remote network access (especially external networks)
  5. Verify authentication settings
    Check BPM configuration files or administration console settings to confirm whether unauthenticated access to the web interface or API endpoints is permitted
    Affected if Unauthenticated or anonymous access is enabled on the BPM service

A system is affected if HP Business Process Monitor version 9.13.1 patch 1 or 9.22 patch 1 is installed AND the service is accessible to unauthenticated remote attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches from HP for Business Process Monitor; if patches are unavailable, implement network segmentation and disable external access to the affected service to reduce exposure.

Fix this in Business Process Monitor Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2366 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2366 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data