CVE-2013-2432
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, 6 Update 43 and earlier, 5.0 Update 41 and earlier, and JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2394 and CVE-2013-1491.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCritical remote code execution vulnerability in the Java 2D component of the JRE (affecting Java SE 7u17 and earlier, 6u43 and earlier, 5.0u41 and earlier, JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier). Allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors in the 2D graphics rendering subsystem, achieving complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.7.0= 1.7.0<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.7.0= 1.7.0<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.5.0<= 2.2.7= 2.0= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.1= 2.2= 2.2.3= 2.2.4= 2.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed JRE versionRun 'java -version' or check JAVA_HOME environment variable and examine the runtime JAR files in the JRE lib directoryAffected if Version is 1.7.0 (any update <= 17), 1.6.0 (any update <= 43), or 1.5.0 (any update <= 41)
-
Determine installed JDK versionRun 'javac -version' or check for JDK installation in Program Files/Java or /usr/lib/jvm/Affected if Version is 1.7.0 (any update <= 17), 1.6.0 (any update <= 43), or 1.5.0 (any update <= 41)
-
Determine installed JavaFX versionCheck for javafx.* packages in the installation, or examine javafx.runtime.version property via 'java -jar' or through the Java Control PanelAffected if Version is 2.2.7 or earlier, or any 2.0.x, 2.1, or 2.2.x release (2.2.3, 2.2.4, 2.2.5)
-
Confirm Java 2D component is in useCheck if the system runs Java applets, Java Web Start applications, or any code that uses java.awt.Graphics2D or javax.imageio rendering pipelinesAffected if The Java 2D rendering pipeline is actively used; the vulnerability is triggered through 2D graphics rendering operations
You are affected if any installed Java SE JRE/JDK is version 1.7.0 update 17 or earlier, 1.6.0 update 43 or earlier, or 1.5.0 update 41 or earlier, OR if JavaFX 2.2.7 or earlier is present and the Java 2D subsystem is used.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Java SE 7 Update 21+, 6 Update 45+, or later patched versions. If patching is not immediately feasible, disable the Java browser plugin or enable click-to-play for Java applet content to reduce attack surface.
Java SE 7 Update 21+ (or Java SE 8 for long-term support), Java SE 6 Update 45+ (if support contract exists), JavaFX 2.2.8+
- Identify all systems running affected Java versions (JDK/JRE 1.5.0, 1.6.0 through Update 43, 7.0 through Update 17, or JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier)
- Stop any applications or services that use the affected Java installations
- For Java SE 5.x (1.5.0): Upgrade to Java SE 7 or later as Java 5 is end-of-life and no longer receives security updates
- For Java SE 6.x: Upgrade to Java SE 6 Update 45 or later (recommended: Java SE 7 or 8 for continued support)
- For Java SE 7.x: Upgrade to Java SE 7 Update 21 or later (recommended: Java SE 8 or later for continued support)
- For JavaFX: Upgrade to JavaFX 2.2.8 or later
- Download the fixed JDK/JRE from Oracle's official Java SE download page (www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/)
- Install the new Java version on all affected systems
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2432 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2432 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data