CVE-2013-2476
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe dissect_hartip function in epan/dissectors/packet-hartip.c in the HART/IP dissector in Wireshark 1.8.x before 1.8.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a packet with a header that is too short.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe HART/IP dissector in Wireshark 1.8.x before 1.8.6 contains an infinite loop vulnerability in the dissect_hartip function. When processing a packet with a header that is too short, the dissector fails to properly validate the header length before entering its parsing loop, causing the loop to continue indefinitely and consume CPU resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.8.0= 1.8.1= 1.8.2= 1.8.3= 1.8.4= 1.8.5= 11.4= 12.1= 12.2= 12.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Wireshark versionRun 'wireshark --version' or go to Help > About Wireshark in the GUI to view the installed version numberAffected if Version is 1.8.0, 1.8.1, 1.8.2, 1.8.3, 1.8.4, or 1.8.5
-
Check if HART/IP dissector is availableIn Wireshark GUI, go to Analyze > Enabled Protocols and search for 'hartip' or 'HART/IP', or inspect the file epan/dissectors/packet-hartip.c in the Wireshark source if availableAffected if The HART/IP protocol dissector is present in the installation
-
Verify HART/IP dissector is enabled for capture analysisIn Wireshark GUI, go to Analyze > Enabled Protocols and confirm 'HART/IP' is checked/enabled, or check if a capture file containing HART/IP traffic would trigger automatic dissectionAffected if HART/IP dissector is enabled and would be invoked when processing network captures
-
On OpenSUSE systems, check installed package versionRun 'rpm -qa | grep wireshark' or 'zypper info wireshark' to view the installed Wireshark package versionAffected if Package version corresponds to Wireshark 1.8.0-1.8.5 as shipped in OpenSUSE 11.4, 12.1, 12.2, or 12.3
You are affected if Wireshark version 1.8.0 through 1.8.5 is installed AND the HART/IP dissector is enabled, because the infinite loop triggers when parsing packets with insufficient header length in the dissect_hartip function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Wireshark to version 1.8.6 or later to obtain the patch. Until then, avoid opening or analyzing untrusted HART/IP capture files with vulnerable Wireshark versions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2476 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2476 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data