CVE-2013-2876
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedbrowser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 does not properly enforce restrictions on the capture of screenshots by extensions, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about the content of a previous page via vectors involving an interstitial page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in browser/extensions/api/tabs/tabs_api.cc in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71. The tabs API failed to properly enforce restrictions on screenshot capture by extensions, allowing malicious extensions to capture screenshots of sensitive content from previous web pages through interstitial page vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0<= 28.0.1500.70= 28.0.1500.0= 28.0.1500.2= 28.0.1500.3= 28.0.1500.4= 28.0.1500.5= 28.0.1500.6= 28.0.1500.8= 28.0.1500.9= 28.0.1500.10= 28.0.1500.11= 28.0.1500.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed Google Chrome versionOpen chrome://version in the Chrome address bar, or go to Menu > Help > About Google Chrome, or run 'google-chrome --version' from the command lineAffected if The installed version is 28.0.1500.70 or lower, or exactly matches one of these versions: 28.0.1500.0, 28.0.1500.2, 28.0.1500.3, 28.0.1500.4, 28.0.1500.5, 28.0.1500.6, 28.0.1500.8, 28.0.1500.9, 28.0.1500.10, 28.0.1500.11, or 28.0.1500.12
-
Check the Debian Linux Chrome package version if running on Debian 7.0Run 'dpkg -l | grep google-chrome' or 'apt-cache policy google-chrome-stable' on the Linux systemAffected if The installed package version matches the affected Chrome versions listed above
The user is affected if they are running Google Chrome version 28.0.1500.70 or any version from 28.0.1500.0 through 28.0.1500.12 on Debian Linux 7.0, as these versions contain the tabs API vulnerability that allows extensions to capture screenshots of sensitive content from previous web pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Google Chrome to version 28.0.1500.71 or later to patch the vulnerability. Organizations should inventory Chrome versions across endpoints and deploy the updated version through standard patch management processes.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2876 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2876 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data