CVE-2013-2954
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe login page in the Console in IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Growth for Oracle E-Business Suite 6.x, 7.x, and 9.x before 9.1.0.3 does not limit the number of incorrect authentication attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe login page in IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Growth for Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 6.x, 7.x, 9.x before 9.1.0.3) lacks authentication attempt limiting, allowing remote attackers to perform unlimited login attempts via brute-force attacks to guess valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.1= 6.3.1= 6.3.2= 6.3.3= 6.4.0= 6.4.1= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 7.1.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm installed product versionLocate the IBM InfoSphere Optim installation directory or check the product's About/Version information panel. Common paths include /opt/IBM/Optim or C:\IBM\Optim on Windows. The version is typically displayed in the product GUI or in version.properties files within the installation directory.Affected if The installed version matches 6.0, 6.1, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.3.3, 6.4.0, 6.4.1, 6.5.0, 6.5.1, 7.1.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2 OR is 9.x version lower than 9.1.0.3.
-
Verify login page is network-accessibleConfirm the Optim login page is exposed on HTTP/HTTPS. The typical URL pattern is https://hostname:port/optim/login or similar. Check your web server configuration (WebSphere, Tomcat, or embedded server) to determine if the login interface is enabled and reachable from the network.Affected if The login page is accessible over the network (not restricted to localhost only).
-
Inspect authentication configuration for rate limitingExamine the web.xml deployment descriptor and application configuration files in the Optim installation for <login-config> settings. Check for any <auth-method> or custom authentication filter configurations. Look for presence of any rate-limiting filter, throttle mechanism, or attempt-counter bean in the configuration files under the conf or config directories.Affected if No rate-limiting, throttling, or login attempt counter filter is configured in the authentication settings.
-
Check for account lockout policy configurationReview the Optim Data Growth configuration files (often named optim configuration, oda-config.xml, or similar) for account lockout settings. Look for parameters such as maxFailedAttempts, lockoutDuration, or accountLockout in the security or authentication configuration sections.Affected if No account lockout or maximum failed attempts policy is defined in the application configuration.
-
Verify web server-level authentication controlsExamine the web server (WebSphere, IIS, or embedded) configuration hosting the Optim application. Check for any authentication rate limiting at the web server layer, including WebSphere login bean settings or custom security constraints related to authentication attempts.Affected if Neither the application layer nor the web server layer enforces limits on failed login attempts.
You are affected if you run any of the listed versions AND the Optim login page is network-accessible AND no rate limiting or account lockout controls are configured at the application or web server level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement account lockout policies and rate limiting on the login page to restrict the number of failed authentication attempts within a given time window.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2954 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data