CVE-2013-3009
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM Java 1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 improperly exposes the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to the AccessController doPrivileged block.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM Java improperly exposes the invoke method of java.lang.reflect.Method, allowing remote attackers to bypass the Java sandbox by calling setSecurityManager through the AccessController doPrivileged block.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.4.2= 1.4.2.13= 1.4.2.13.1= 1.4.2.13.2= 1.4.2.13.3= 1.4.2.13.4= 1.4.2.13.5= 1.4.2.13.6= 1.4.2.13.7= 1.4.2.13.8= 1.4.2.13.9= 1.4.2.13.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Java installationRun 'java -version' and check for IBM Java (not Oracle/OpenJDK). On Windows check the installation directory for IBM patterns.Affected if The system is not running IBM Java, only IBM Java versions in the 1.4.2 through 1.4.2.13.10 range are affected.
-
Determine the exact IBM Java versionRun 'java -version 2>&1' or check the release file in the Java installation directory for the full version string like 1.4.2, 1.4.2.13, 1.4.2.13.5, etc.Affected if The version matches 1.4.2, 1.4.2.13, 1.4.2.13.1, 1.4.2.13.2, 1.4.2.13.3, 1.4.2.13.4, 1.4.2.13.5, 1.4.2.13.6, 1.4.2.13.7, 1.4.2.13.8, 1.4.2.13.9, or 1.4.2.13.10.
-
Check Java Security Manager configurationInspect any application configurations or startup scripts that set a custom Security Manager via System.setSecurityManager or the -securty Java flag.Affected if The flaw allows bypass of the Security Manager, but the vulnerability exists regardless of whether a custom Security Manager is configured; the presence of the com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in the IBM Java runtime is the trigger.
You are affected if IBM Java version 1.4.2 through 1.4.2.13.10 is installed and the com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class is present in the runtime.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Java to version 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 SR14, 6.0.1 SR6, 7 SR5 or later to remediate this sandbox bypass vulnerability.
IBM Java 1.4.2 SR13-FP18 (or later 1.4.2.x release)
- Confirm current IBM Java version by running 'java -version' or checking the installation
- Download IBM Java 1.4.2 SR13-FP18 (or later 1.4.2.x release) from IBM Fix Central or official IBM distribution channels
- Backup any critical applications and configuration files dependent on the current Java installation
- Install the upgraded IBM Java 1.4.2 SR13-FP18 or later version
- Update JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to the new installation path if necessary
- Restart any running applications to ensure they use the new Java runtime
- Verify the fix by confirming the com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class no longer improperly exposes the Method.invoke() method
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3009 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.ibm.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.security-explorations.com
- www.security-explorations.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3009 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data