CVE-2013-3010
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6 and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3007.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a critical-severity vulnerability (CVSS 9.3) in IBM Java Runtime Environment versions 6.0.1 before SR6 and 7 before SR5. The vulnerability is described as 'unspecified' with unknown attack vectors, but the CVSS metrics indicate it allows remote attackers to achieve complete impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability - consistent with remote code execution. It is distinct from CVE-2013-3007.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0.1.0= 7.0.0.0= 7.0.1.0= 7.0.2.0= 7.0.3.0= 7.0.4.0= 7.0.4.1= 7.0.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Java is installedLook for IBM Java installations in common paths such as: /opt/ibm/java, /usr/lib/jvm/ibm-*, or check for 'IBM' in java -version output. On Windows, check Program Files/IBM/Java or via registry.Affected if IBM Java Runtime Environment is present on the system
-
Determine the exact IBM Java versionRun 'java -version' and capture the full version string. For IBM Java, the output typically shows 'IBM Java' in the vendor line. Also check version.properties in the JRE/lib directory for the full version number including Service Refresh (SR) level.Affected if The version output shows IBM Java without SR6 or later (for 6.0.1 line) or without SR5 or later (for 7.x line)
-
Compare against affected version rangesParse the version number. For the 6.0.1 line, versions 6.0.1.0 through 6.0.1.5 are affected. For the 7.x line, versions 7.0.0.0 through 7.0.4.2 are affected. Look for SR (Service Refresh) indicator in the version string.Affected if Version is 6.0.1.0 through 6.0.1.5 (no SR6) OR version is 7.0.0.0, 7.0.1.0, 7.0.2.0, 7.0.3.0, 7.0.4.0, 7.0.4.1, or 7.0.4.2 (no SR5)
If IBM Java 6.0.1 versions before SR6 or IBM Java 7 versions before SR5 are installed and exposed, the environment is vulnerable to this critical remote code execution flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM Java patches: upgrade to IBM Java 6.0.1 SR6 or later, or IBM Java 7 SR5 or later. This is a critical priority given the high CVSS score and complete CIA impact.
IBM Java 6.0.1 SR6 or later; IBM Java 7 SR5 or later
- 1. Identify the exact version of IBM Java currently installed by running 'java -version' or checking the system package manager
- 2. For IBM Java 6.0.1.x installations: upgrade to IBM Java 6.0.1 SR6 (Service Refresh 6) or later
- 3. For IBM Java 7.x installations: upgrade to IBM Java 7 SR5 (Service Refresh 5) or later
- 4. Download the fixed version from IBM Fix Central (https://www-01.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) or your organization's software repository
- 5. Install the new Java version following standard deployment procedures
- 6. Verify the new version is active: run 'java -version' and confirm it shows the updated release
- 7. Test critical applications to ensure compatibility with the new Java version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,360.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3010 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3010 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data