CVE-2013-3011
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 1.4.2 before 1.4.2 SR13-FP18, 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, availability, and integrity via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3009 and CVE-2013-3012.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHigh-severity unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java Runtime Environment affecting versions 1.4.2, 5.0, 6, 6.0.1, and 7 prior to specific patch levels. Allows remote attackers to fully impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability through unknown vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0.0.0= 5.0.11.0= 5.0.11.1= 5.0.11.2= 5.0.12.0= 5.0.12.1= 5.0.12.2= 5.0.12.3= 5.0.12.4= 5.0.12.5= 5.0.13.0= 5.0.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Java is installedRun 'java -version' and examine the output for IBM Java (look for 'IBM' in the vendor string). On Linux/Unix, also check /opt/ibm/java or similar installation directories, or use 'which java' and 'ls -la' on the java binary to identify the vendor.Affected if The output shows IBM Java as the vendor rather than Oracle, OpenJDK, or other vendors.
-
Determine the exact IBM Java versionRun 'java -version' with verbose output, or use 'java -XshowSettings:all -version' to get detailed version information including the full build number (for example, 5.0.12.5 or 6.0.1 SR5).Affected if A specific version string such as 5.0.0.0, 5.0.11.0 through 5.0.14.0 is displayed in the version output.
-
Compare installed version against affected 5.0 versionsMatch the installed IBM Java 5.0 version against the known affected list: 5.0.0.0, 5.0.11.0, 5.0.11.1, 5.0.11.2, 5.0.12.0, 5.0.12.1, 5.0.12.2, 5.0.12.3, 5.0.12.4, 5.0.12.5, 5.0.13.0, or 5.0.14.0.Affected if The installed version exactly matches one of these versions from the affected list.
-
Check for IBM Java 6, 6.0.1, or 7 installationsIf IBM Java 6, 6.0.1, or 7 is installed, determine the Service Release (SR) level by examining the version string or using 'java -version' output.Affected if IBM Java 6 is at SR13 or earlier, IBM Java 6.0.1 is at SR5 or earlier, or IBM Java 7 is at SR4 or earlier.
The environment is affected if IBM Java is installed and the version matches 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.14.0 (specifically the listed versions), or if IBM Java 6/6.0.1/7 is at a Service Release level earlier than the fixed versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Java to version 1.4.2 SR13-FP18 or later, 5.0 SR16-FP3 or later, 6 SR14 or later, 6.0.1 SR6 or later, or 7 SR5 or later. Since these are legacy versions, consider migrating to a currently supported Java version.
IBM Java 5.0 SR16-FP3
- 1. Identify the current IBM Java version installed using 'java -version' or checking the system PATH
- 2. Download IBM Java 5.0 SR16-FP3 or later from IBM's official support portal or authorized distributors
- 3. Back up any existing Java applications and configuration files
- 4. Install the new IBM Java 5.0 SR16-FP3 version
- 5. Update JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to the new installation path
- 6. Update any scripts or applications that reference the old Java path
- 7. Verify the installation by running 'java -version' and confirming it shows version 5.0 SR16-FP3 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.ibm.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3011 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data