CVE-2013-3026
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Lotus Quickr for Domino ActiveX control in qp2.cab in IBM Lotus Quickr 8.1 before FP 8.1.0.32-001a, 8.2 before FP 8.2.0.28-001a, and 8.5.1 before FP 8.5.1.39-002a for Domino allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the IBM Lotus Quickr for Domino ActiveX control (qp2.cab) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted website. The vulnerability affects multiple versions (8.1 before FP 8.1.0.32-001a, 8.2 before FP 8.2.0.28-001a, and 8.5.1 before FP 8.5.1.39-002a) and is exploited through malicious web pages targeting the vulnerable ActiveX component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.1.0= 8.2.0= 8.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate IBM Lotus Quickr for Domino installationSearch the system for the Quickr installation directory, typically found under C:\Program Files\IBM\Lotus\Quickr or check Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\Lotus\Quickr for the InstallPath valueAffected if The product is not installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionLocate the version file within the Quickr installation directory or check the Windows registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\Lotus\Quickr\CurrentVersion for the version valueAffected if The version is 8.1.0, 8.2.0, or 8.5.1 without the corresponding fix packs (FP 8.1.0.32-001a, FP 8.2.0.28-001a, or FP 8.5.1.39-002a)
-
Verify ActiveX control presenceSearch for qp2.cab or qp2.dll in the Quickr installation directory, typically under the domino\html\code directoryAffected if The qp2.cab or qp2.dll ActiveX control file exists on the system
-
Check ActiveX control registrationOpen Internet Explorer, go to Tools > Manage Add-ons, and look for the Quickr ActiveX control or query the Windows registry under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT for entries containing 'Quickr' or 'qp2'Affected if The ActiveX control is registered and enabled in Internet Explorer
A user is affected if they have an unpatched version of Lotus Quickr for Domino (8.1.0, 8.2.0, or 8.5.1 before the specified fix packs) installed with the qp2 ActiveX control present and enabled in their browser.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied fix packs (FP 8.1.0.32-001a, FP 8.2.0.28-001a, or FP 8.5.1.39-002a or later). If immediate patching is not possible, disable or restrict the affected ActiveX control via browser security settings or network-level access controls to prevent malicious web-based exploitation.
Lotus Quickr 8.1 to FP 8.1.0.32-001a+, or 8.2 to FP 8.2.0.28-001a+, or 8.5.1 to FP 8.5.1.39-002a+
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Lotus Quickr for Domino (8.1, 8.2, or 8.5.1)
- 2. For Lotus Quickr 8.1: Upgrade to Fix Pack 8.1.0.32-001a or later
- 3. For Lotus Quickr 8.2: Upgrade to Fix Pack 8.2.0.28-001a or later
- 4. For Lotus Quickr 8.5.1: Upgrade to Fix Pack 8.5.1.39-002a or later
- 5. Obtain the appropriate Fix Pack from IBM Support (www-01.ibm.com)
- 6. Apply the Fix Pack following IBM's standard upgrade procedures for Lotus Quickr for Domino
- 7. Verify the version after upgrade to confirm the patch was applied successfully
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3026 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data