CVE-2013-3155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Access 2007 SP3, 2010 SP1 and SP2, and 2013 in Microsoft Office allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted Access file, aka "Access Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3157.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a memory corruption vulnerability in Microsoft Access that can be triggered by opening a specially crafted Access database file (.accdb or .mdb). The vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the current user or cause a denial of service through memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2007= 2010= 2013CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Microsoft Access is installedOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features, or use PowerShell command: Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*Access*'}Affected if Microsoft Access appears in the installed programs list
-
Identify installed Access versionOpen Access application, go to File > Account > About Access, or right-click the Access executable in its installation folder and view Properties > Details to find the Version numberAffected if The version shown is 2007, 2010, or 2013 (exact versions listed in affected products)
-
Confirm exact build number for version 2007If Access 2007 is detected, run: msaccess.exe /exui (or check the file version of msaccess.exe in the Office12 folder typically found in Program Files or Program Files (x86))Affected if Build number matches Access 2007 without MS13-074 security update applied
-
Confirm exact build number for version 2010If Access 2010 is detected, check the file version of msaccess.exe in the Office14 folderAffected if Build number matches Access 2010 without MS13-074 security update applied
-
Confirm exact build number for version 2013If Access 2013 is detected, check the file version of msaccess.exe in the Office15 folderAffected if Build number matches Access 2013 without MS13-074 security update applied
If Microsoft Access versions 2007, 2010, or 2013 are installed without the MS13-074 security update, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2013-3155 when opening specially crafted .accdb or .mdb files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate Microsoft security update (MS13-074) to vulnerable Access versions. Users should not open Access files from untrusted or unknown sources until patches are applied.
Upgrade to Microsoft Access 2016 or Microsoft 365 for continued security support
- Check for and apply the relevant Microsoft security update for this CVE. Navigate to the Microsoft Security Response Center (msrc.microsoft.com) and search for CVE-2013-3155 to obtain the specific KB article number for your Access version.
- Open Microsoft Access and go to File > Account > Update Options > Update Now to check for pending Office updates.
- Alternatively, manually download the security update from the Microsoft Update Catalog (catalog.update.microsoft.com) using the KB number obtained from step 1.
- For Access 2007 SP3: Ensure you have the December 2013 security update installed or later.
- For Access 2010 SP1/SP2: Ensure you have the December 2013 security update installed or later.
- For Access 2013: Ensure you have the December 2013 security update installed or later.
- After applying the update, verify the installation was successful via Windows Update history.
- Consider upgrading to a newer Microsoft Access version (2016 or Microsoft 365) if available, as older versions may have limited security support.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data