Rsa Authentication AgentApplication · Emc

CVE-2013-3280

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EMC RSA Authentication Agent 7.1.x before 7.1.2 for Web for Internet Information Services has a fail-open design, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via vectors that trigger an agent crash.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

EMC RSA Authentication Agent 7.1.x before 7.1.2 for Web deployed on IIS contains a fail-open design flaw. When the agent crashes due to crafted requests, it defaults to allowing unauthenticated access instead of blocking traffic, enabling remote attackers to bypass authentication entirely.

MitigationUpgrade to EMC RSA Authentication Agent 7.1.2 or later, which addresses the fail-open vulnerability. Until patched, implement additional network-level access controls to detect and block crash-inducing requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rsa Authentication AgentApplication
Affected:= 7.1= 7.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed RSA Authentication Agent version
    Check the installed version of EMC RSA Authentication Agent for Web via the Windows Programs and Features control panel, the agent's management console, or by querying the installed binaries. Compare the version number to the affected range (7.1 and 7.1.1).
    Affected if The installed version is 7.1 or 7.1.1 (versions before 7.1.2).
  2. Confirm IIS deployment
    Verify that the RSA Authentication Agent for Web is deployed on Internet Information Services (IIS). Check IIS Manager for RSA Web Agent modules or examine the IIS configuration for RSA-related ISAPI filters or modules.
    Affected if The RSA Authentication Agent for Web is running on IIS and the vulnerable version (7.1/7.1.1) is installed.
  3. Verify Web Agent module is enabled
    Inspect the IIS configuration (applicationHost.config or site-level web.config) to confirm the RSA Web Agent authentication module is loaded and active for the protected application pool or website.
    Affected if The RSA Web Agent module is enabled and the server runs a vulnerable version.
  4. Check agent status and crash behavior
    Monitor the RSA Authentication Agent service status and review IIS/Windows event logs for any crash events or authentication failures that may indicate the fail-open condition has been triggered.
    Affected if The agent has crashed or exhibited fail-open behavior on a vulnerable version, allowing unauthenticated access.

The environment is affected if EMC RSA Authentication Agent for Web version 7.1 or 7.1.1 is installed and deployed on IIS with the Web authentication module enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to EMC RSA Authentication Agent 7.1.2 or later, which addresses the fail-open vulnerability. Until patched, implement additional network-level access controls to detect and block crash-inducing requests.

Fix this in Rsa Authentication Agent Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,020
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,232.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3280 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data