CVE-2013-3404
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.1(x) through 9.1(1a) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, leading to discovery of encrypted credentials by leveraging metadata, aka Bug ID CSCuh01051.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) versions 7.1(x) through 9.1(1a) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. The vulnerability enables discovery of encrypted credentials by leveraging database metadata, providing an attacker with sensitive authentication material.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1\(2a\)= 7.1\(2a\)su1= 7.1\(2b\)= 7.1\(2b\)su1= 7.1\(3\)= 7.1\(3a\)= 7.1\(3a\)su1= 7.1\(3a\)su1a= 7.1\(3b\)= 7.1\(3b\)su1= 7.1\(3b\)su2= 7.1\(5\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco Unified Communications Manager is installedLocate CUCM installation by checking for the 'Cisco Unified Communications Manager' service or product installation directory, typically under /usr/local/cm/ or via the OS service listAffected if CUCM software is present on the system
-
Identify the installed CUCM versionRun the CLI command 'show version' from the CUCM server console or access the Cisco Unified Reporting tool to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within 7.1(2a) through 9.1(1a), including any 7.1.x variants up to 7.1(5) and versions 8.x through 9.1(1a)
-
Verify management interface accessibilityCheck network configuration for CUCM web interface (HTTPS port 8443) and CTI manager port exposure to determine if the interface is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if CUCM admin interfaces are exposed to networks beyond the trusted internal network
-
Review logs for suspicious SQL patternsExamine CUCM SDS and RTMT logs located in /var/log/active/ for SQL injection attempt indicators such as unexpected SQL syntax, UNION SELECT statements, or anomalous database queriesAffected if Logs contain SQL-like patterns or unauthorized database queries originating from external sources
A system is affected if it runs Cisco Unified Communications Manager version 7.1(x) through 9.1(1a) and has its management interfaces network-accessible, as the SQL injection flaw exists in that version range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco Unified Communications Manager to a version beyond 9.1(1a) that addresses this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the CUCM management interfaces and monitor for suspicious SQL-like patterns in logs.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3404 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3404 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data