Virtualization Experience Client 6000 Series FirmwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2013-3408

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The firmware on Cisco Virtualization Experience Client 6000 devices sets incorrect operating-system permissions, which allows local users to gain privileges via an unspecified sequence of commands, aka Bug ID CSCuc31764.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Cisco Virtualization Experience Client 6000 firmware implements incorrect operating-system file or directory permissions, allowing a local authenticated user to escalate privileges through an unspecified sequence of commands. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability requiring authenticated local access.

MitigationApply the Cisco firmware update that corrects OS permission settings. If no update is available, restrict physical and local console access to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Virtualization Experience Client 6000 Series FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Virtualization Experience Client 6000Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions
Virtualization Experience Client 6215Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco VXC 6000 series devices on your network
    Review your hardware asset inventory or physically inspect devices for 'Cisco Virtualization Experience Client 6000' or 'VXC 6215' labeling
    Affected if You have any Cisco VXC 6000, VXC 6000 Series, or VXC 6215 devices deployed
  2. Check device access logs for local authenticated sessions
    If the device management interface provides logs, review for successful local console or SSH login events from untrusted accounts
    Affected if Local console or terminal access logs show login sessions by users who should not have local access rights
  3. Look for unexpected new user accounts on the device
    If you have administrative access to the device OS (via debug mode or serial console), list user accounts and compare to known baseline
    Affected if Newly created local user accounts exist that were not provisioned by your administration team
  4. Check for privilege escalation indicators
    Review system logs or audit records for commands or actions performed by users who previously had lower privilege levels
    Affected if Users who should have limited privileges are executing commands or accessing files outside their normal scope
  5. Verify physical security controls on device location
    Inspect the physical location where devices are deployed and review access control logs for the room or enclosure
    Affected if Physical access to the device console is not restricted to trusted personnel

You are affected if you have any Cisco VXC 6000, VXC 6000 Series, or VXC 6215 devices, since all versions contain the permission flaw that allows a local authenticated user to escalate privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco firmware update that corrects OS permission settings. If no update is available, restrict physical and local console access to trusted users only.

Fix this in Virtualization Experience Client 6000 Series Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3408 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3408 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data