CVE-2013-3459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 7.1(x) before 7.1(5b)su6a does not properly handle errors, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service disruption) via malformed registration messages, aka Bug ID CSCuf93466.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco Unified Communications Manager 7.1(x) versions before 7.1(5b)su6a fail to properly handle errors when processing malformed SIP registration messages. Remote attackers can send specially crafted registration messages that trigger the improper error handling, causing the service to become unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1\(2a\)= 7.1\(2a\)su1= 7.1\(2b\)= 7.1\(2b\)su1= 7.1\(3\)= 7.1\(3a\)= 7.1\(3a\)su1= 7.1\(3a\)su1a= 7.1\(3b\)= 7.1\(3b\)su1= 7.1\(3b\)su2= 7.1\(5\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed CUCM versionLog into the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Administration interface and navigate to About > Version, or run 'show version' via CLI on the CUCM serverAffected if The installed version matches one of the listed affected versions: 7.1(2a), 7.1(2a)su1, 7.1(2b), 7.1(2b)su1, 7.1(3), 7.1(3a), 7.1(3a)su1, 7.1(3a)su1a, 7.1(3b), 7.1(3b)su1, 7.1(3b)su2, or 7.1(5)
-
Verify SIP service is enabledIn CUCM Administration, navigate to System > Service Parameters and check if the Cisco CallManager (SIP) service is activated, or verify SIP trunking/endpoints are configuredAffected if SIP service is enabled and handling registration messages, which is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Check for service availability issuesMonitor the Cisco CallManager service status via the RTMT (Real Time Monitoring Tool) or check for recent service restarts or availability alerts in the system logsAffected if The Cisco CallManager service shows unexpected restarts or unavailability that correlates with potential malformed SIP registration attempts
You are affected if you are running any of the listed Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.1 versions with SIP service enabled, as the vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via malformed SIP registration messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco Unified Communications Manager to version 7.1(5b)su6a or later to resolve the error handling deficiency in registration message processing.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data