CVE-2013-3486
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIrfanView FlashPix Plugin 4.3.4 0 has an Integer Overflow Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe IrfanView FlashPix plugin 4.3.4 contains an integer overflow vulnerability. Integer overflows in image parsing plugins typically occur when calculating buffer sizes or memory allocations based on image dimensions from malformed files, potentially leading to heap corruption and arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.3.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate IrfanView installationCheck common installation paths (e.g., C:\Program Files\IrfanView, C:\Program Files (x86)\IrfanView) or search for irfanview.exeAffected if IrfanView is not installed, the system is not affected by this specific plugin vulnerability
-
Find the FlashPix plugin fileLook for fpix.dll in the IrfanView plugins directory (usually <IrfanView_install_path>\plugins\)Affected if The fpix.dll file is not present, the FlashPix plugin is not installed and this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the FlashPix plugin versionRight-click fpix.dll, select Properties, then view the Details tab for File Version; alternatively use: dir fpix.dll /-N or a file version viewer toolAffected if The version is exactly 4.3.4.0 (the affected version)
-
Check if .fpx file handling is enabledOpen IrfanView, go to Options > Properties/Settings > Plugins or check file associations for .fpx files in Windows settingsAffected if IrfanView is configured to open .fpx files (this is the attack vector that enables exploitation)
You are affected if IrfanView with FlashPix plugin version 4.3.4.0 is installed and configured to handle .fpx files
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade IrfanView and its FlashPix plugin to the latest version. As a temporary measure, avoid opening untrusted FlashPix (.fpx) files with IrfanView.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3486 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3486 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data