CVE-2013-3488
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) before 1.7.0.7858 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted MPEG-2 Transport Stream (M2TS) file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in MPC-HC (Media Player Classic - Home Cinema) versions prior to 1.7.0.7858. The vulnerability is triggered when parsing specially crafted MPEG-2 Transport Stream (M2TS) files, allowing an attacker to overwrite stack memory and execute arbitrary code remotely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.7.0.7858CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if MPC-HC is installedLook for MPC-HC in the system: check Program Files folder, or search for 'mpc-hc.exe' using file explorer or the 'where' command in Command Prompt (e.g., where mpc-hc.exe). Also check Add/Remove Programs for Media Player Classic - Home Cinema.Affected if MPC-HC is found on the system
-
Determine the installed MPC-HC versionRight-click the mpc-hc.exe file, select Properties, then go to the Details tab to view the File Version. Alternatively, open MPC-HC, go to Help > About and note the version number displayed.Affected if The version displayed is lower than 1.7.0.7858
-
Verify M2TS file handling capabilityCheck if MPC-HC has file associations or can open .m2ts files. Look for .m2ts in the file types registered with MPC-HC (in Windows, check Default Programs > Set Associations). Try opening any .m2ts file with MPC-HC if one is available.Affected if MPC-HC can open or has associations with M2TS files, indicating the vulnerable parsing feature is active
If MPC-HC is installed with a version lower than 1.7.0.7858 and can handle M2TS files, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.7.0.7858
Update MPC-HC to version 1.7.0.7858 or later. Avoid opening untrusted M2TS files from unknown sources until the update is applied.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3488 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data