Airlive Wl2600camHardware / appliance · Ovislink

CVE-2013-3686

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
cgi-bin/operator/param in AirLive WL2600CAM and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to obtain the administrator password via a list action.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The AirLive WL2600CAM IP camera web interface contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/operator/param endpoint. By sending a request with the 'list' action parameter, an unauthenticated remote attacker can retrieve the administrator password in plaintext, gaining full administrative access to the camera.

MitigationApply available firmware updates from the vendor; if no patch exists, restrict network access to the camera via firewall rules or VLAN segmentation, or replace the device with a currently supported model.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Airlive Wl2600camHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the camera's web interface and check the system information or firmware page, or examine the HTTP server banner/responses for 'AirLive' or 'WL2600CAM' identifiers
    Affected if The device is an AirLive WL2600CAM IP camera (all versions)
  2. Verify web interface accessibility
    Attempt to access the camera's HTTP web interface on the expected IP address and port (typically port 80 or 8080)
    Affected if The web interface is reachable from the network segment being tested
  3. Test the vulnerable endpoint for authentication bypass
    Send an HTTP GET request to /cgi-bin/operator/param?action=list (or similar 'list' action parameter) without providing any authentication credentials
    Affected if The endpoint returns administrator credentials or configuration data without requiring authentication
  4. Confirm plaintext password exposure
    Examine the response from the vulnerable endpoint to determine if the administrator password is returned in plaintext XML or similar format
    Affected if The response contains the administrator password in plaintext rather than a challenge or access denied message
  5. Check network exposure
    Determine if the camera's web interface is accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet without firewall filtering
    Affected if The camera is accessible without network-level access controls

The user is affected if they have an AirLive WL2600CAM with its web interface accessible on the network and the /cgi-bin/operator/param endpoint returns plaintext admin credentials without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available firmware updates from the vendor; if no patch exists, restrict network access to the camera via firewall rules or VLAN segmentation, or replace the device with a currently supported model.

Fix this in Airlive Wl2600cam Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3686 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data