Simatic Pcs7Application · Siemens

CVE-2013-3958

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-06-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The login implementation in the Web Navigator in Siemens WinCC before 7.2 Update 1, as used in SIMATIC PCS7 8.0 SP1 and earlier and other products, has a hardcoded account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via an unspecified request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Siemens WinCC Web Navigator contains a hardcoded account in its login implementation that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to the system. This is a classic backdoor vulnerability where credentials are embedded in the application code, bypassing normal authentication mechanisms.

MitigationUpdate WinCC to version 7.2 Update 1 or later to receive the patch. If immediate patching is not feasible, disable the Web Navigator service or implement network segmentation/firewall rules to restrict access to trusted IP addresses only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Simatic Pcs7Application
Affected:<= 8.0= 8.0
WinccApplication
Affected:<= 7.2= 7.0= 7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Siemens WinCC or Simatic Pcs7 is installed
    Check the installed programs on the system for Siemens WinCC or Simatic Pcs7. Look in the Windows Programs and Features list or check the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Siemens\).
    Affected if Either Siemens WinCC or Simatic Pcs7 is installed on the system.
  2. Check the installed WinCC version
    Open the Windows registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Siemens\WinCC\Version or check the version info of the WinCC executable in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is WinCC 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, or any version <= 7.2.
  3. Check the installed Simatic Pcs7 version
    Open the Windows registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Siemens\Automation\PCS7\Version or check version information in the Simatic Manager.
    Affected if The installed version is Simatic Pcs7 8.0 or any version <= 8.0.
  4. Verify if WinCC Web Navigator component is enabled
    Check for the presence of the Web Navigator service or IIS website configuration. Look for the 'Web Navigator' service in Windows Services or check for Web Navigator virtual directories in IIS if configured.
    Affected if The WinCC Web Navigator service is installed and running, or the Web Navigator component is enabled on the system.
  5. Check for the hardcoded backdoor account
    Inspect the Web Navigator login configuration files or binaries for embedded credentials. This account exists in the login implementation code and bypasses normal authentication.
    Affected if The hardcoded account exists in the Web Navigator login implementation, which would allow unauthenticated access when the Web Navigator is accessible.

The system is affected if Siemens WinCC (7.0, 7.1, or <= 7.2) or Simatic Pcs7 (<= 8.0) is installed with the Web Navigator component enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.0
Interim mitigation

Update WinCC to version 7.2 Update 1 or later to receive the patch. If immediate patching is not feasible, disable the Web Navigator service or implement network segmentation/firewall rules to restrict access to trusted IP addresses only.

Fix this in Simatic Pcs7 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3958 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3958 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data