CVE-2013-4081
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe http_payload_subdissector function in epan/dissectors/packet-http.c in the HTTP dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.16 and 1.8.x before 1.8.8 does not properly determine when to use a recursive approach, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a crafted packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe HTTP dissector in Wireshark contains a stack consumption vulnerability in the http_payload_subdissector function. The function fails to properly limit recursion depth when processing HTTP payload data, allowing a crafted malicious packet to trigger excessive recursive calls that exhaust the stack and cause a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.8.0= 1.8.1= 1.8.2= 1.8.3= 1.8.4= 1.8.5= 1.8.6= 1.8.7= 1.6.0= 1.6.1= 1.6.2= 1.6.3= 7.0= 11.4= 12.2= 12.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Wireshark versionRun 'wireshark --version' or 'tshark --version' from command line. On Debian/Ubuntu, also check 'dpkg -l | grep wireshark'. On RHEL/CentOS, use 'rpm -qi wireshark'. On OpenSUSE, use 'rpm -qi wireshark'.Affected if The version displayed is 1.6.0 through 1.6.3, or 1.8.0 through 1.8.7
-
Confirm Wireshark HTTP dissector is accessibleVerify Wireshark is installed by checking for the executable: 'which wireshark' or 'which tshark'. The HTTP dissector is built into Wireshark by default.Affected if Wireshark or TShark is installed and the HTTP protocol dissector is available (enabled by default)
-
Check for recent packet capture processing activityReview recent tshark capture jobs, look at Wireshark recent files, or check system logs for pcap/pcapng file processing. On Linux, check /tmp for recently accessed capture files or review bash history for tshark/wireshark commands.Affected if The system has been used to open or analyze pcap files containing HTTP traffic within the affected timeframe
-
Determine if running affected Debian or OpenSUSE versionFor Debian: check 'cat /etc/debian_version' - if it shows 7.0, the system ships vulnerable Wireshark packages. For OpenSUSE: check 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'cat /etc/SuSE-release' - versions 11.4, 12.2, or 12.3 ship vulnerable Wireshark.Affected if Operating system is Debian 7.0, OpenSUSE 11.4, 12.2, or 12.3 with vulnerable Wireshark packages installed
You are affected if Wireshark version 1.8.0-1.8.7 or 1.6.0-1.6.3 is installed AND you process pcap files or live network traffic containing HTTP packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Wireshark to version 1.6.16 or later (1.6.x branch) or version 1.8.8 or later (1.8.x branch) to obtain the vendor patch. Alternatively, avoid opening untrusted packet capture files or processing traffic from untrusted sources until the update is applied.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4081 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data