CryptocatApplication · Cryptocat Project

CVE-2013-4102

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.0.22 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cryptocat before 2.0.22 strophe.js Math.random() Random Number Generator Weakness

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cryptocat before version 2.0.22 used the JavaScript Math.random() function in the strophe.js library for cryptographic operations. Math.random() is not a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator (CSPRNG) and produces predictable output, making encrypted communications vulnerable to being decrypted by attackers.

MitigationUpgrade Cryptocat to version 2.0.22 or later which implements a proper cryptographically secure random number generator for cryptographic operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CryptocatApplication
Affected:< 2.0.22

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cryptocat installation
    Search for the Cryptocat application or browser extension in your system. Check browser extension directories (e.g., ~/.config/chromium/Extensions/ for Chrome, or equivalent profile directories for other browsers). Look for folders or files containing 'cryptocat' in the name.
    Affected if Cryptocat is installed and is a version before 2.0.22
  2. Determine installed Cryptocat version
    If found as a browser extension, open the manifest.json file in the extension folder and check the 'version' field. For desktop installations, check the application's 'About' section or its metadata files.
    Affected if The version field shows a number less than 2.0.22 (e.g., 2.0.21, 2.0.20, etc.)
  3. Inspect strophe.js library for Math.random usage
    Locate the strophe.js file within the Cryptocat extension or installation directory. Open the file and search for occurrences of 'Math.random()'. Check if it is used in functions related to key generation, session tokens, or encryption.
    Affected if Math.random() appears in the code and is used within cryptographic contexts (e.g., generating keys, random nonces, or session identifiers)
  4. Verify browser extension is active
    Open your browser's extension manager (chrome://extensions for Chrome) and confirm Cryptocat is enabled and running.
    Affected if Cryptocat extension is enabled and the version is below 2.0.22

You are affected if Cryptocat version is below 2.0.22 and the strophe.js library uses Math.random() for cryptographic operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.0.22 or later
Fixed in 2.0.22
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cryptocat to version 2.0.22 or later which implements a proper cryptographically secure random number generator for cryptographic operations.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.0.22

  1. Ensure all users upgrade their Cryptocat installation to version 2.0.22 or later
  2. Download Cryptocat version 2.0.22 or the latest stable release from the official source
  3. Reinstall or update the Cryptocat application/browser extension
  4. Verify the installed version shows 2.0.22 or higher

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Cryptocat Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4102 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data