CVE-2013-4158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsmokeping before 2.6.9 has XSS (incomplete fix for CVE-2012-0790)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSmokeping before version 2.6.9 contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that represents an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-0790. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through unsanitized input fields in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0= 18= 19< 2.6.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Smokeping is installedRun: dpkg -l | grep smokeping (Debian) or rpm -qa | grep smokeping (Fedora/RHEL)Affected if Smokeping package is found on the system
-
Determine installed Smokeping versionRun: dpkg -s smokeping (Debian) or rpm -qi smokeping (Fedora) and note the Version fieldAffected if Version is lower than 2.6.9 (for example, 2.6.8, 2.6.7, etc.)
-
Verify web interface is enabledCheck if Apache or other web server is configured with Smokeping CGI, or look for smokeping.fcgi or smokeping.cgi in web server directories (commonly /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ or /var/www/cgi-bin/)Affected if The Smokeping CGI web interface is present and accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Confirm the installation sourceIf using Debian, check /etc/debian_version to confirm running version 8, 9, or 10; if using Fedora, confirm version 18 or 19Affected if Running Debian 8, 9, or 10, or Fedora 18 or 19, with Smokeping installed from system packages
You are affected if Smokeping is installed with a version lower than 2.6.9 and the web interface CGI is accessible, particularly on Debian 8/9/10 or Fedora 18/19 systems.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.6.9
Upgrade Smokeping to version 2.6.9 or later to obtain the complete fix for the XSS vulnerability.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data