CVE-2013-4284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCumin, as used in Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.4, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a crafted Ajax update request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCumin (a component in Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.4) fails to properly handle malformed Ajax update requests, allowing remote attackers to trigger excessive CPU and memory consumption leading to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Red Hat Enterprise MRG versionCheck the installed version of Red Hat Enterprise MRG by running 'rpm -q mrg-release' or checking /etc/redhat-release for MRG-specific entriesAffected if The installed version equals 2.4 exactly
-
Confirm Cumin component is presentCheck if the Cumin package is installed: run 'rpm -qa | grep -i cumin' or look for /usr/bin/cumin in the filesystemAffected if Cumin is installed on the system
-
Identify Cumin web interface exposureCheck if Cumin's web service is running and accessible: look for processes listening on typical web ports (8000, 8080) or check /etc/cumin/cumin.conf for web server configurationAffected if Cumin's web interface with Ajax update functionality is exposed and accessible over the network
-
Verify Ajax endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access Cumin's Ajax update endpoints (typically at /update or /ajax paths) or examine web server logs for requests to these endpointsAffected if The Ajax update endpoints are reachable without authentication or proper request validation
The environment is affected if running Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.4 with Cumin installed and its web interface with Ajax update endpoints exposed to network requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of Cumin or Red Hat Enterprise MRG, or implement request validation/limiting on Ajax endpoints to reject crafted requests.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data