TomcatWeb server / proxy · Apache

CVE-2013-4286

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-02-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3, when an HTTP connector or AJP connector is used, does not properly handle certain inconsistent HTTP request headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger incorrect identification of a request's length and conduct request-smuggling attacks via (1) multiple Content-Length headers or (2) a Content-Length header and a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2005-2090.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Tomcat versions before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3 improperly handle inconsistent HTTP request headers (multiple Content-Length headers or Content-Length with Transfer-Encoding: chunked) in HTTP/AJP connectors. This allows remote attackers to conduct request-smuggling attacks by manipulating header interpretation, exploiting incomplete mitigation from CVE-2005-2090.

MitigationUpgrade to Tomcat 6.0.39+, 7.0.47+, or 8.0.0-RC3+ and validate application compatibility, as this is a server-side request-smuggling vulnerability exploitable via malformed HTTP headers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TomcatWeb server / proxy
Affected:= 7.0.0= 7.0.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.3= 7.0.4= 7.0.10= 7.0.11= 7.0.12= 7.0.13= 7.0.14= 7.0.15= 7.0.16

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Tomcat installation and version
    Locate the Tomcat installation directory (common paths: /opt/tomcat, /usr/share/tomcat, or on Windows C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\TomcatX). Check the RELEASE-NOTE file in the root directory or run the version command: catalina.sh version (Linux/Unix) or catalina.bat version (Windows)
    Affected if Installed version is Apache Tomcat 6.0.x before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, or 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3
  2. Confirm exact 7.x version if applicable
    If running Tomcat 7.x, verify the specific minor version from the release notes or version output. The vulnerable versions in the 7.x branch are: 7.0.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.0.4, 7.0.10, 7.0.11, 7.0.12, 7.0.13, 7.0.14, 7.0.15, and 7.0.16
    Affected if The installed version matches any of: 7.0.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.0.4, 7.0.10, 7.0.11, 7.0.12, 7.0.13, 7.0.14, 7.0.15, or 7.0.16
  3. Identify active connectors in server.xml
    Open the conf/server.xml file and locate all <Connector> elements. Check the protocol attribute value for each connector. Look for connectors with protocol="HTTP/1.1" or protocol="AJP/1.3" (or their equivalent Coyote connector classes)
    Affected if HTTP or AJP protocol connectors are defined and enabled in the server configuration

Environment is affected if running a vulnerable Tomcat version (6.0.x before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, or 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3) with HTTP or AJP connectors enabled, allowing request-smuggling via malformed Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding headers

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Tomcat 6.0.39+, 7.0.47+, or 8.0.0-RC3+ and validate application compatibility, as this is a server-side request-smuggling vulnerability exploitable via malformed HTTP headers.

Fix this in Tomcat Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4286 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data