Seco Versatile Security ManagerApplication · Huawei

CVE-2013-4633

HIGH · 9.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-06-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Huawei Seco Versatile Security Manager (VSM) before V200R002C00SPC300 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a certain change to a group configuration setting.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Huawei Seco Versatile Security Manager (VSM) versions prior to V200R002C00SPC300 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability where remote authenticated users can elevate their privileges by modifying certain group configuration settings. The vulnerability allows an authenticated user to gain higher-level privileges than originally assigned.

MitigationUpgrade Huawei VSM to version V200R002C00SPC300 or later. Review group configuration settings and audit user account privileges after patching to ensure no unauthorized privilege escalation has occurred.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Seco Versatile Security ManagerApplication
Affected:= v200r002c00= v200r002c00spc100= v200r002c00spc200

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed VSM version
    Access the VSM administrative interface or use the command line interface to retrieve the current software version. Common methods include logging into the management console and viewing the system information page, or executing the 'display version' command if CLI access is available.
    Affected if The installed version matches v200r002c00, v200r002c00spc100, or v200r002c00spc200 (versions prior to V200R002C00SPC300).
  2. Verify user authentication status
    Determine if your VSM instance is accessible via remote authentication. Check whether user accounts have been created and are able to log into the VSM system.
    Affected if Remote authenticated users can access the VSM system, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated session to exploit.
  3. Examine group configuration settings
    Review the group configuration settings within the VSM administrative interface. Look for settings that control user privileges and group-level permissions, particularly any options that allow modification of privilege levels for user accounts.
    Affected if Group configuration settings contain options that allow authenticated users to modify privilege levels, enabling elevation beyond their assigned permissions.
  4. Audit user privilege assignments
    Review all user accounts and their current privilege assignments within the VSM. Compare assigned privileges against expected baseline permissions for each user role.
    Affected if Any user account possesses higher privileges than originally intended, indicating possible exploitation of the privilege escalation vulnerability.

A user is affected if the installed VSM version is prior to V200R002C00SPC300 and remote authenticated access exists, allowing modification of group configuration settings to elevate privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Huawei VSM to version V200R002C00SPC300 or later. Review group configuration settings and audit user account privileges after patching to ensure no unauthorized privilege escalation has occurred.

Recommended fix High confidence

V200R002C00SPC300

  1. Upgrade Huawei Seco Versatile Security Manager (VSM) to version V200R002C00SPC300 or later
  2. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the VSM version in the system administration panel
  3. Confirm that the group configuration settings are properly restricted to prevent privilege escalation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Seco Versatile Security Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4633 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4633 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data