CVE-2013-4811
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUpdateDomainControllerServlet in the SNAC registration server in HP ProCurve Manager (PCM) 3.20 and 4.0, PCM+ 3.20 and 4.0, and Identity Driven Manager (IDM) 4.0 does not properly validate the adCert argument, which allows remote attackers to upload .jsp files and consequently execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1743.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHP ProCurve Manager's UpdateDomainControllerServlet fails to validate the adCert parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbitrary JSP files to the server's webroot. Since JSP files are executable, attackers can achieve remote code execution by requesting the uploaded files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 3.20= 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed HP ProCurve Manager or HP Identity Driven Manager versionCheck the application's version through its About/Help dialog, installation directory readme files, or registry keys under HKLM\Software\HP\ProCurve Manager or similar HP product registry paths. Compare against affected versions: HP ProCurve Manager 3.20 or 4.0, HP Identity Driven Manager 4.0.Affected if The installed version matches exactly 3.20 or 4.0 for ProCurve Manager, or 4.0 for Identity Driven Manager.
-
Verify the UpdateDomainControllerServlet is exposedCheck the application's web.xml deployment descriptor (typically in conf or WEB-INF directory) for the servlet mapping for UpdateDomainControllerServlet. The servlet is typically accessible at /servlet/UpdateDomainControllerServlet or similar path under the application context.Affected if The UpdateDomainControllerServlet is mapped and the application web interface is reachable without authentication.
-
Check network accessibility of SNAC registration port 5435Use netstat or ss to check if port 5435 (default SNAC registration server port) is listening on external interfaces, or scan the server from an external host using nmap -p 5435 <target>.Affected if Port 5435 is bound to 0.0.0.0 or accessible from untrusted networks without firewall filtering.
-
Inspect webroot for unauthorized JSP filesSearch the application's web document root (typically the 'webapps' or 'deploy' directory) for any .jsp files that were not deployed as part of the legitimate application, especially in root or subdirectories accessible via HTTP.Affected if Unexpected .jsp files exist in web-accessible directories, particularly with suspicious names like shell, cmd, or random alphanumeric strings.
-
Review access logs for exploitation attemptsExamine HTTP access logs for POST requests to the UpdateDomainControllerServlet containing the adCert parameter, especially those submitting .jsp content or path traversal sequences. Look for unusual request patterns around the upload servlet.Affected if Logs show POST requests to UpdateDomainControllerServlet with unexpected parameter values or .jsp file extensions in the request body.
A system is affected if it runs HP ProCurve Manager 3.20/4.0 or HP Identity Driven Manager 4.0 with the UpdateDomainControllerServlet accessible over the network and either the vulnerable port 5435 is exposed or unexpected JSP files appear in the webroot.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply HP patches when available. Until then, restrict network access to the SNAC registration server port (default 5435) or disable the servlet via web.xml. Implement WAF rules to block .jsp upload attempts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4811 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4811 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data