Maximo Asset ManagementApplication · Ibm

CVE-2013-5395

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Maximo Asset Management 6.2 through 6.2.8, 7.1 before 7.1.1.12, and 7.5 before 7.5.0.5 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Maximo Asset Management contains an access control bypass vulnerability affecting versions 6.2 through 6.2.8, 7.1 before 7.1.1.12, and 7.5 before 7.5.0.5. Remote attackers can circumvent intended security restrictions through unspecified vectors, potentially allowing unauthorized access to sensitive asset management functions and data.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Maximo Asset Management to version 7.1.1.12 or 7.5.0.5 or later. For version 6.2.x, which appears to be end-of-life without a fix, consider migration to a supported version or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and strict access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Maximo Asset ManagementApplication
Affected:= 7.1= 7.1.1= 7.1.1.1= 7.1.1.2= 7.1.1.5= 7.1.1.6= 7.1.1.7= 7.1.1.8= 7.1.1.9= 7.1.1.10= 7.1.1.11= 7.5.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Maximo Asset Management version
    Check the Maximo application version through the About dialog in the Maximo client, or query the maxversion table in the Maximo database (SELECT * FROM maxversion), or inspect the ibm/maximo/version.properties file in the application deployment directory
    Affected if The installed version is 6.2.x through 6.2.8, or 7.1.x (including 7.1 and 7.1.1.x) before 7.1.1.12, or 7.5.x before 7.5.0.5
  2. Confirm specific version matches CVE affected list
    Compare your exact version number against the known affected versions: 7.1, 7.1.1, 7.1.1.1, 7.1.1.2, 7.1.1.5, 7.1.1.6, 7.1.1.7, 7.1.1.8, 7.1.1.9, 7.1.1.10, 7.1.1.11, or 7.5.0.0
    Affected if Your exact version matches any of these versions or falls within the vulnerable ranges described in the CVE
  3. Determine if application is network-accessible
    Review network configuration to confirm whether the Maximo web interface (typically on ports 9080, 9443, or similar) is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if The Maximo application is reachable from untrusted networks without proper network segmentation or firewall restrictions
  4. Check for unauthenticated access points
    Inspect the Maximo web application configuration files (web.xml, ibm-web-bnd.xmi) and the Maximo security configuration to identify any endpoints that may permit unauthenticated or anonymous access
    Affected if The application allows unauthenticated access to sensitive asset management functions or data through any exposed endpoint

Your environment is affected if you are running IBM Maximo Asset Management version 6.2.x through 6.2.8, 7.1.x before 7.1.1.12, or 7.5.x before 7.5.0.5 and the application is network-accessible to potential attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM Maximo Asset Management to version 7.1.1.12 or 7.5.0.5 or later. For version 6.2.x, which appears to be end-of-life without a fix, consider migration to a supported version or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and strict access controls.

Fix this in Maximo Asset Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
48.0 hours of engineering $8,320
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,312.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5395 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data