Cognos ExpressApplication · Ibm

CVE-2013-5444

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-03-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The server in IBM Cognos Express 9.0 before IFIX 2, 9.5 before IFIX 2, 10.1 before IFIX 2, and 10.2.1 before FP1 allows remote attackers to read encrypted credentials via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Cognos Express contains a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to read encrypted credentials from the server via unspecified vectors. This is an information disclosure vulnerability affecting versions 9.0, 9.5, 10.1, and 10.2.1 before their respective IFIX updates.

MitigationApply the appropriate IBM IFIX (IFIX 2 for versions 9.0, 9.5, and 10.1; FP1 for version 10.2.1) to resolve the credential disclosure vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cognos ExpressApplication
Affected:= 9.0= 9.5= 10.1= 10.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Cognos Express version
    Locate the Cognos installation directory and find the version information file (typically version.txt, version.info, or check the Cognos Configuration tool). The version is also visible in the Cognos Administration console under System > System Overview.
    Affected if The installed version is 9.0, 9.5, 10.1, or 10.2.1 and no IFIX has been applied
  2. Check if IFIX 2 is installed for versions 9.0, 9.5, and 10.1
    In the Cognos installation directory, look for an IFIX subdirectory or check the installed fixes via the Cognos Configuration tool under Security > Global Security > IBM Cognos services. Alternatively, review installation logs for references to IFIX 2.
    Affected if IFIX 2 is not present for versions 9.0, 9.5, or 10.1, leaving the credential disclosure flaw unpatched
  3. Check if FP1 is installed for version 10.2.1
    In the Cognos installation directory, review the fix pack information via the Cognos Configuration tool or check the installed fixes documentation. Look for references to Fix Pack 1 (FP1) in installation logs or version details.
    Affected if Fix Pack 1 is not installed on version 10.2.1, indicating the vulnerability remains unpatched
  4. Review access controls and network exposure
    Since the attack vector is remote and involves reading credentials from the server, verify that the Cognos server is not directly exposed to untrusted networks. Check firewall rules and Cognos Gateway configuration to assess external accessibility.
    Affected if The Cognos Express instance is accessible from untrusted networks without proper authentication barriers, increasing exploitability

You are affected if IBM Cognos Express version 9.0, 9.5, 10.1, or 10.2.1 is installed without the corresponding IFIX 2 or FP1 patch applied, and the server is network-accessible to potential attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the appropriate IBM IFIX (IFIX 2 for versions 9.0, 9.5, and 10.1; FP1 for version 10.2.1) to resolve the credential disclosure vulnerability.

Fix this in Cognos Express Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,960
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,736.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5444 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data