iOSOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2013-5477

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-09-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The T1/E1 driver-queue functionality in Cisco IOS 12.2 and 15.0 through 15.3, when an HDLC32 driver is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (interface queue wedge) via bursty network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCub67465.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Cisco IOS affecting the T1/E1 driver-queue functionality when the HDLC32 driver is used. Remote attackers can send bursty network traffic to cause an interface queue wedge, effectively locking up the affected interface and preventing legitimate traffic from being processed.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco IOS security update for Bug ID CSCub67465 to all affected devices. As a workaround, consider implementing traffic rate limiting or access controls on affected interfaces until the patch can be deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
iOSOperating system
Affected:= 12.2= 15.0= 15.1= 15.2= 15.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device OS platform
    Run 'show version' and confirm the device is running Cisco IOS (not IOS-XE, NX-OS, or ASA)
    Affected if The device does not run Cisco IOS - this CVE only affects Cisco IOS
  2. Check the IOS version
    Run 'show version' and note the software version (for example, 15.1(4)M2)
    Affected if The version falls outside the 12.2, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, or 15.3 trains - only these specific version ranges are affected
  3. Determine if T1/E1 interfaces exist
    Run 'show ip interface brief' or 'show controllers t1' to list T1/E1 interface names
    Affected if No T1/E1 interfaces are present - the vulnerability requires T1/E1 interfaces to be exploitable
  4. Verify HDLC32 driver usage on T1/E1 interfaces
    Run 'show controllers t1 [interface]' and look for HDLC32 in the driver information or check the encapsulation type with 'show interface [interface]'
    Affected if HDLC32 driver is not in use on the T1/E1 interface - the vulnerability only triggers when HDLC32 is the active driver
  5. Check interface queue status
    Run 'show interface [t1/e1-interface]' and examine the input queue (hold queue) for signs of wedging or excessive drops
    Affected if The interface input queue shows signs of being wedged or has high drop counts, which may indicate exploitation

A device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS versions 12.2, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, or 15.3 and has T1/E1 interfaces utilizing the HDLC32 driver, making those specific interfaces vulnerable to queue wedge and denial of service.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco IOS security update for Bug ID CSCub67465 to all affected devices. As a workaround, consider implementing traffic rate limiting or access controls on affected interfaces until the patch can be deployed.

Fix this in iOS Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5477 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data