CVE-2013-5552
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 12.4(24)MDB9 and earlier on Content Services Gateway (CSG) devices does not properly implement the "parse error drop" feature, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted series of packets, aka Bug ID CSCug90143.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco IOS 12.4(24)MDB9 and earlier on Content Services Gateway (CSG) devices contains a flaw in the 'parse error drop' feature implementation. This feature, intended to drop packets that fail parsing and enforce access restrictions, can be bypassed by remote attackers sending crafted packet sequences that evade the parse error detection mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 12.4\(24\)mdb14= 12.4\(24\)md= 12.4\(24\)md1= 12.4\(24\)md2= 12.4\(24\)md3= 12.4\(24\)md4= 12.4\(24\)md5= 12.4\(24\)md5a= 12.4\(24\)md6= 12.4\(24\)md7= 12.4\(24\)md8= 12.4\(24\)md9all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device typeCheck if the device is a Cisco Content Services Gateway (CSG) by examining the hardware model or using 'show version' command to confirm the platform nameAffected if Device is a Cisco Content Services Gateway (any version)
-
Check IOS versionExecute 'show version' on the device and locate the IOS release number in the output. Compare the version string against the affected ranges: 12.4(24)MDB9 and earlier, or any of 12.4(24)md through 12.4(24)md9, 12.4(24)md5a, 12.4(24)mdb14Affected if IOS version matches <=12.4(24)mdb14 or equals 12.4(24)md through 12.4(24)md9, 12.4(24)md5a, or 12.4(24)mdb9
-
Locate parse error drop configurationExecute 'show running-config | include parse' or 'show running-config all' and search for parse error drop related commands or features in the configurationAffected if A parse error drop feature is configured on the device
-
Verify parse error drop is activeCheck the current configuration state using 'show parser statistics' or examine ACL/policy configurations that reference parse error handling. Confirm the feature is actively applied to traffic flowsAffected if Parse error drop feature is actively applied to traffic processing
Device is affected if it is a Cisco Content Services Gateway (any version) OR runs an affected Cisco IOS version (12.4(24)md through 12.4(24)md9/12.4(24)mdb14 or earlier), AND the parse error drop feature is configured and active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Cisco IOS patch for Bug ID CSCug90143 to address the improper parse error drop implementation. If patching is immediately infeasible, implement additional network-layer access controls and ingress filtering to reduce attack surface on CSG devices.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5552 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5552 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data