CVE-2013-5592
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 25.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox's browser engine before version 25.0 allow remote attackers to cause memory corruption, denial of service via application crash, or potentially execute arbitrary code through unknown attack vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 24.0= 19.0= 19.0.1= 19.0.2= 20.0= 20.0.1= 21.0= 22.0= 23.0= 23.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Mozilla Firefox is installedCheck for Firefox executable or application. On Windows: look in Program Files or Program Files (x86) for Mozilla Firefox folder. On macOS: check /Applications for Firefox.app. On Linux: run 'which firefox' or check /usr/lib/firefoxAffected if Firefox is not present on the system
-
Determine installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, click menu > Help > About Firefox, or type 'about:support' in address bar, or run 'firefox --version' from command lineAffected if Version displayed is 24.0 or lower, or matches 19.0, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 20.0, 20.0.1, 21.0, 22.0, 23.0, or 23.0.1
-
Confirm version against affected listCompare your installed version number to the affected ranges: versions <= 24.0 and specifically 19.0, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 20.0, 20.0.1, 21.0, 22.0, 23.0, 23.0.1Affected if Installed version appears in the affected list
A user is affected if their installed Firefox version is 24.0 or lower, or matches any of the specific affected versions 19.0.x, 20.0.x, 21.0, 22.0, or 23.0.x.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Mozilla Firefox to version 25.0 or later to remediate these vulnerabilities.
Firefox 25.0 or later (current stable release recommended)
- 1. Back up any important browser data (bookmarks, passwords, extensions)
- 2. Close all Firefox instances
- 3. Download Firefox 25.0 or later from the official Mozilla website (www.mozilla.org)
- 4. Run the installer and follow the prompts to upgrade
- 5. After installation, verify the version by navigating to Help > About Firefox
- 6. Ensure the version shows 25.0 or higher
- 7. Re-enable any disabled add-ons that are compatible with the new version
- 8. Test critical web applications to ensure functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5592 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5592 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data