CVE-2013-5606
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe CERT_VerifyCert function in lib/certhigh/certvfy.c in Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.15 before 3.15.3 provides an unexpected return value for an incompatible key-usage certificate when the CERTVerifyLog argument is valid, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CERT_VerifyCert function in NSS 3.15.x before 3.15.3 returns an unexpected value when validating certificates with incompatible key usage, specifically when a valid CERTVerifyLog argument is provided. This causes the function to appear successful when it should fail, potentially allowing attackers with crafted certificates to bypass access restrictions that depend on proper certificate validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.15= 3.15.1= 3.15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NSS library versionRun 'nss --version' or check the NSS library file (e.g., libnss3.so) using 'pkg-config --modversion nss' or 'strings libnss3.so | grep '^3\.' on Linux systems'Affected if The version displayed is exactly 3.15, 3.15.1, or 3.15.2
-
Confirm application uses CERT_VerifyCertReview application source code or binary to determine if it calls the CERT_VerifyCert function for certificate validationAffected if The application calls CERT_VerifyCert to validate certificates
-
Check for CERTVerifyLog usageInspect the application code to determine if a valid CERTVerifyLog structure is passed as the log parameter to CERT_VerifyCertAffected if A non-null CERTVerifyLog argument is provided to CERT_VerifyCert when validating certificates
-
Identify certificate validation scenariosMonitor or review logs to identify if certificates with key usage extensions are being validated, particularly certificates where key usage is incompatible with the intended purpose (e.g., signing-only keys used for encryption)Affected if The application validates certificates with potentially incompatible key usage using the affected NSS versions
You are affected if NSS version is exactly 3.15, 3.15.1, or 3.15.2 AND your application uses CERT_VerifyCert with a valid CERTVerifyLog argument to validate certificates with incompatible key usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade NSS to version 3.15.3 or later. Applications and systems using the affected NSS library versions should be identified and patched to prevent potential access restriction bypasses.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- kb.juniper.net
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- security.gentoo.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vmware.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- developer.mozilla.org
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5606 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data