CVE-2013-5895
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 and JavaFX 2.2.45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to JavaFX.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u45 and JavaFX 2.2.45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to JavaFX. The vulnerability is exploitable over the network and targets the JavaFX component specifically.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 6.0= 6.0= 5.0= 6.0= 6.5= 6.5.z= 6.0<= 7.0.08<= 7.0.08CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' to determine the installed Java version. On Red Hat systems, also check '/usr/lib/jvm/java-*-version' or use 'alternatives --display java'. For HP JDK/JRE, check '/opt/java* /version' or the hp-jdk-install-path.Affected if The version shows Java SE 7u45 or earlier (7u0 through 7u45), or HP JDK/JRE version 7.0.08 or lower.
-
Identify the Java vendor and distributionRun 'java -version' and note the vendor line (Oracle, OpenJDK, HP, Red Hat). Check the package name using 'rpm -qa | grep java' or 'dpkg -l | grep java' depending on the package manager.Affected if The installed Java is from Oracle (Java SE 7u45), HP JDK/JRE, or Red Hat Enterprise Linux Supplementary packages.
-
Verify if JavaFX component is presentCheck for JavaFX installation by looking for javafx* packages via 'rpm -qa | grep javafx' or 'dpkg -l | grep javafx'. Also check the Java installation directory for javafx-related JAR files in the lib folder.Affected if JavaFX 2.2.45 or earlier is installed alongside the vulnerable Java version.
-
Confirm Red Hat system version if applicableIf running Red Hat Enterprise Linux, check the version with 'cat /etc/redhat-release' or 'rpm -q redhat-release'. Verify supplementary channel is enabled via 'yum repolist' looking for 'supplementary' repository.Affected if Running RHEL 5.0, 6.0, 6.5, or 6.5.z with the Supplementary repository enabled and vulnerable Java/JDK packages installed.
-
Check HP JDK/JRE package version if applicableIf HP JDK or JRE is installed, query the package version using 'rpm -q hp-jdk' or 'rpm -q hp-jre' if available. Check the installation directory for version markers.Affected if HP JDK or HP JRE version 7.0.08 or earlier is installed.
A user is affected if they have Oracle Java SE 7u45 or earlier, or JavaFX 2.2.45 or earlier, or HP JDK/JRE 7.0.08 or earlier installed, particularly on affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions with JavaFX enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a supported Java version beyond 7u45 (preferably Java 8 or later) and ensure JavaFX components are updated to patched versions. Alternatively, disable JavaFX in untrusted environments if upgrade is not feasible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5895 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data