CVE-2013-6014
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJuniper Junos 10.4 before 10.4S15, 11.4 before 11.4R9, 11.4X27 before 11.4X27.44, 12.1 before 12.1R7, 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D20, 12.1X45 before 12.1X45-D15, 12.2 before 12.2R6, 12.3 before 12.3R3, 13.1 before 13.1R3, and 13.2 before 13.2R1, when Proxy ARP is enabled on an unnumbered interface, allows remote attackers to perform ARP poisoning attacks and possibly obtain sensitive information via a crafted ARP message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJuniper Junos contains a vulnerability where Proxy ARP enabled on an unnumbered interface fails to properly validate ARP messages, allowing remote attackers to send crafted ARP messages and perform ARP poisoning attacks. This can enable man-in-the-middle attacks and disclosure of sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.4= 11.4= 11.4x27= 12.1= 12.1x44= 12.1x45= 12.2= 12.3= 13.1= 13.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the Juniper deviceAffected if Version matches 10.4, 11.4, 11.4x27, 12.1, 12.1x44, 12.1x45, 12.2, 12.3, 13.1, or 13.2
-
Identify unnumbered interfacesRun 'show configuration interfaces' and look for 'unnumbered-interface' statements in the configurationAffected if Any interface is configured as unnumbered (uses 'unnumbered-interface lo0' or similar)
-
Verify Proxy ARP status on unnumbered interfacesRun 'show configuration protocols arp' and check interface-specific proxy-arp settings, or run 'show arp' to inspect current ARP behavior; examine interface config for 'proxy-arp' under the unnumbered interface hierarchyAffected if Proxy ARP is enabled on an unnumbered interface (proxy-arp configuration present under the interface)
The system is affected if running an affected Junos version AND has Proxy ARP enabled on an unnumbered interface, as this specific combination allows the ARP poisoning attack vector.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos to the fixed versions (10.4S15, 11.4R9, 11.4X27.44, 12.1R7, 12.1X44-D20, 12.1X45-D15, 12.2R6, 12.3R3, 13.1R3, 13.2R1 or later). Alternatively, if Proxy ARP is not required, disable it on unnumbered interfaces.
Upgrade to the first fixed release in your current branch: 10.4S15, 11.4R9, 11.4X27.44, 12.1R7, 12.1X44-D20, 12.1X45-D15, 12.2R6, 12.3R3, 13.1R3, or 13.2R1 (whichever corresponds to your current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which branch (10.4S, 11.4R, 11.4X27, 12.1R, 12.1X44, 12.1X45, 12.2, 12.3, 13.1, or 13.2) is in use
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed release for the identified branch from the Juniper support portal (kb.juniper.net)
- 4. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using 'request system software add <package>' or via SCP/FTP
- 5. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' to apply the upgrade
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm the fix is applied
- 7. Alternatively, if Proxy ARP on unnumbered interfaces is not required, disable it using 'set protocols arp interface <if-name> no-proxy-arp' under the respective interface configuration
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6014 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data