Rsa Netwitness NextgenApplication · Emc

CVE-2013-6180

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-12-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EMC RSA Security Analytics (SA) 10.x before 10.3, and RSA NetWitness NextGen 9.8, does not ensure that SA Core requests originate from the SA REST UI, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sending a Core request from a web browser or other unintended user agent.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

EMC RSA Security Analytics 10.x before 10.3 and RSA NetWitness NextGen 9.8 fail to validate that SA Core requests originate from the legitimate SA REST UI. Attackers can bypass access restrictions by sending Core requests directly from a web browser or other user agents, effectively exploiting a missing origin/referer validation or CSRF protection mechanism.

MitigationImplement proper origin/referer header validation or CSRF token validation to ensure Core requests originate exclusively from the SA REST UI. Upgrade to version 10.3 or later for RSA Security Analytics.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rsa Netwitness NextgenApplication
Affected:= 9.8
Rsa Security AnalyticsApplication
Affected:= 10.0= 10.1= 10.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RSA product and version
    Locate the installed version of RSA Security Analytics or RSA NetWitness NextGen. Check the product UI about/help page, or use the command line interface if available to query the version number.
    Affected if The installed version is RSA Security Analytics 10.0, 10.1, or 10.2, or RSA NetWitness NextGen 9.8
  2. Verify REST API endpoint exposure
    Identify the SA Core REST API endpoint URL in your environment (typically at /sdk or similar paths under the Security Analytics web interface). Attempt to access this endpoint directly using a tool like curl or a browser, without including the legitimate Origin or Referer header that would be sent by the SA REST UI.
    Affected if The REST API accepts and processes requests without validating the Origin or Referer header
  3. Test for CSRF token requirement
    Send a valid authenticated request to the Core API but omit any CSRF token or anti-CSRF parameter. Observe whether the request is accepted and executed.
    Affected if Requests succeed without requiring a valid CSRF token or anti-CSRF header
  4. Confirm browser-based request execution
    From a different domain or subdomain, attempt to trigger an action against the SA Core API (such as a configuration change or query) using a simple HTML form or JavaScript fetch, simulating how an attacker would exploit this from a malicious page.
    Affected if The browser-based request from a foreign origin is successfully processed by the SA Core

If the installed version matches 9.8 for NetWitness or 10.0-10.2 for Security Analytics AND the REST API accepts requests without proper Origin/Referer validation or CSRF tokens, the environment is affected.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper origin/referer header validation or CSRF token validation to ensure Core requests originate exclusively from the SA REST UI. Upgrade to version 10.3 or later for RSA Security Analytics.

Fix this in Rsa Netwitness Nextgen Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6180 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data