CVE-2013-6282
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe (1) get_user and (2) put_user API functions in the Linux kernel before 3.5.5 on the v6k and v7 ARM platforms do not validate certain addresses, which allows attackers to read or modify the contents of arbitrary kernel memory locations via a crafted application, as exploited in the wild against Android devices in October and November 2013.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe get_user and put_user API functions in Linux kernel versions before 3.5.5 on ARM v6k and v7 platforms lack proper address validation, allowing unprivileged applications to read from or write to arbitrary kernel memory locations. This memory corruption vulnerability enables privilege escalation to root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.54>= 3.3, < 3.4.12>= 3.5, < 3.5.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify system architectureRun 'uname -m' or check /proc/cpuinfo for 'Processor' or 'model name' fields. Look for ARMv6 or ARMv7 indicators.Affected if System is NOT running on ARM v6k or ARM v7 architecture (the vulnerability only affects these ARM variants)
-
Determine installed kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the kernel version string.Affected if Kernel version falls into any of these ranges: < 3.2.54, OR >= 3.3 but < 3.4.12, OR >= 3.5 but < 3.5.5
-
Verify ARM subarchitecture variantCheck /proc/device-tree/compatible or examine boot logs for 'v6k' or 'v7' indicators in the ARM variant string.Affected if The ARM subarchitecture is NOT v6k or v7 (the flaw exists specifically in these ARM variants, not other ARM versions)
-
Confirm get_user/put_user API presenceThese are kernel API functions. Check kernel configuration or module list for kernel headers usage. On Android, examine /system/lib/modules/ for loaded kernel module dependencies.Affected if These functions are present in the kernel (they are standard kernel APIs, so this is typically true for any Linux kernel)
-
Validate exploitation conditionThe vulnerability requires unprivileged application execution. Confirm if the device allows running arbitrary applications (typical for Android devices, uncommon for locked-down embedded systems).Affected if The system permits execution of untrusted/unprivileged applications by non-root users
A system is affected if it runs on ARM v6k or ARM v7 architecture with a kernel version in the ranges < 3.2.54, >= 3.3 but < 3.4.12, or >= 3.5 but < 3.5.5.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.543.4.123.5.5
Apply the upstream kernel patch addressing the missing address validation in get_user/put_user and update to Linux kernel 3.5.5 or later on affected ARM v6k/v7 systems, including Android devices.
Upgrade to Linux Kernel 3.2.54, 3.4.12, 3.5.5, or later stable releases
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which upstream kernel branch your version is based on (e.g., 3.2.x, 3.4.x, or 3.5.x)
- Obtain and install the fixed kernel version for your distribution: 3.2.54, 3.4.12, or 3.5.5 (or any later stable release)
- Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by running `uname -r` and confirming the version is >= the fixed version for your branch
- For ARM-based Android devices, ensure the device manufacturer has released a firmware update containing this kernel patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6282 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data