OpensamlApplication · Internet2

CVE-2013-6440

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-02-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The (1) BasicParserPool, (2) StaticBasicParserPool, (3) XML Decrypter, and (4) SAML Decrypter in Shibboleth OpenSAML-Java before 2.6.1 set the expandEntityReferences property to true, which allows remote attackers to conduct XML external entity (XXE) attacks via a crafted XML DOCTYPE declaration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The vulnerability exists in Shibboleth OpenSAML-Java versions before 2.6.1 where the BasicParserPool, StaticBasicParserPool, XML Decrypter, and SAML Decrypter components set expandEntityReferences to true, allowing XML External Entity (XXE) attacks via crafted XML DOCTYPE declarations.

MitigationUpgrade to OpenSAML-Java 2.6.1 or later which disables entity expansion by default, or configure XML parsers to disable external entity processing and DOCTYPE declarations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpensamlApplication
Affected:= 2.0= 2.1.0= 2.2.0
OpensamlApplication
Affected:<= 2.6.0= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 2.4.2= 2.4.3= 2.5.0= 2.5.1= 2.5.2= 2.5.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenSAML-Java version
    Locate the opensaml JAR file in your application lib or classpath, or check your pom.xml/build.gradle for the opensaml dependency version. Common JAR names include opensaml-*.jar or openws-*.jar.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.0, 2.1.0, 2.2.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, or any version 2.6.0 or lower.
  2. Locate BasicParserPool or StaticBasicParserPool usage
    Search your Java source code, configuration files, and XML parsing setup code for references to 'BasicParserPool' or 'StaticBasicParserPool' classes from the OpenSAML library.
    Affected if Your application uses either BasicParserPool or StaticBasicParserPool to parse XML documents.
  3. Inspect parser pool configuration for expandEntityReferences
    Examine the code or configuration where BasicParserPool or StaticBasicParserPool is instantiated. Look for a call to setExpandEntityReferences(true) or check if expandEntityReferences is explicitly set to true in any parser configuration.
    Affected if expandEntityReferences is set to true, or the parser uses default settings in a version affected by this CVE.
  4. Check XML Decrypter and SAML Decrypter usage
    Search for usage of XMLDecrypter or SAMLDecrypter classes in your codebase. These components also utilize vulnerable parser pool settings.
    Affected if Your application uses XMLDecrypter or SAMLDecrypter from the affected OpenSAML versions.

You are affected if you use OpenSAML-Java versions 2.0 through 2.6.0 and your application uses BasicParserPool, StaticBasicParserPool, XMLDecrypter, or SAMLDecrypter with default or explicit expandEntityReferences=true settings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to OpenSAML-Java 2.6.1 or later which disables entity expansion by default, or configure XML parsers to disable external entity processing and DOCTYPE declarations.

Fix this in Opensaml Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6440 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6440 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data